Are Israeli Settlements the Barrier to Peace?|5 Minute Video

Is Israel’s policy of structure civilian communities in the West Bank the factor there’s no peace contract with the Palestinians? Or would there still be no peace even if Israel eliminated all of its settlements and kicked out Israeli settlers, as it did in Gaza in 2005?

PragerU is experiencing severe censorship on Big Tech platforms. Go to https://www.prageru.com/ to see our videos devoid of censorship!

SUBSCRIBE https://www.prageru.com/join/

Take PragerU videos with you all over you go. Download our absolutely free mobile app!
Download for Apple iOS ➡ https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/prage …
Download for Android ➡ https://play.google.com/store/apps/de …

Join PragerU’s text list! https://optin.mobiniti.com/prageru

STORE! Love PragerU? Visit our shop today! https://shop.prageru.com/

Script:

Is Israel’s policy of structure civilian areas in the area referred to as the West Bank the reason there is no irreversible peace in between Israel and the Palestinians?

The response to that issue, in spite of all the sound and fury relating to the so-called settlement concern, is no.

The Israeli settlements in the West Bank are not the significant barrier to a peace arrangement.

A little historic context will make this clear.

For twenty years before June of 1967, the West Bank, consisting of much of Jerusalem, was controlled by Jordan. During that time– a time when Israel did not have a single settlement– there were many Palestinian fear attacks versus the country state of the Jewish individuals. Basically, Palestinians devoted horror attacks against Israel when there were no settlements and they devoted horror attacks against Israel when there were settlements.

If Israel were to pull out of every single settlement in the West Bank tomorrow, it’s not likely that anything much would alter. Israel could be even worse off if history is any indicator.

In 2005, Israel deserted every community, every home, every farm, every structure it had really integrated in the Gaza Strip. They released countless rockets and many other fear attacks versus the nation state of the Jewish people. Can you blame Israel for not wishing to risk a two-front rocket war?

Israel has no right to be in the West Bank at all, great deals of state. Allow me, a law teacher at Harvard, to state that on the basis of worldwide law this position is inaccurate.

Military professions are plainly permitted under global law following an aggressive attack by a neighboring state. Jordan, Israel’s neighbor to the East, assaulted Israel in 1967, in spite of Israel’s duplicated efforts to keep Jordan out of the Six Day War.

Considering that no peace treaty has actually been reached and the terrorism continues with brand-new attacks threatened almost daily, Israel is under no legal responsibility to leave. Provided the threat that Israel would be putting itself in if it did leave the West Bank– exposing its significant cities and global airport to rocket attacks– it would be careless to do so, which is why Israel is still there.

I entirely acknowledge that a military profession is significantly different, both as a matter of law and politics, from developing civilian settlements even in an area that is legally based on a military occupation. That’s why I have actually long opposed the structure of settlements in the West Bank. I think it has activated bitterness and has actually offered enemies of Israel a reason to attack the legitimacy of the profession in basic.

For the total script, go to https://www.prageru.com/videos/are-israeli-settlements-barrier-peace

source

Is Israel’s policy of structure civilian areas in the West Bank the factor there’s no peace contract with the Palestinians? Or would there still be no peace even if Israel got rid of all of its settlements and evicted Israeli residents, as it carried out in Gaza in 2005? When Israel did not have a single settlement– there were numerous Palestinian terror attacks against the country state of the Jewish people, throughout that time– a time. In other words, Palestinians devoted horror attacks against Israel when there were no settlements and they dedicated worry attacks versus Israel when there were settlements.

Given the threat that Israel would be putting itself in if it did leave the West Bank– exposing its significant cities and worldwide airport to rocket attacks– it would be negligent to do so, which is why Israel is still there.

When Israel did not have a single settlement– there were many Palestinian horror attacks against the country state of the Jewish people, throughout that time– a time. Just put, Palestinians committed horror attacks versus Israel when there were no settlements and they devoted horror attacks versus Israel when there were settlements.

Or would there still be no peace even if Israel removed all of its settlements and evicted Israeli occupants, as it did in Gaza in 2005? Throughout that time– a time when Israel did not have a single settlement– there were numerous Palestinian horror attacks against the nation state of the Jewish people. In other words, Palestinians dedicated horror attacks against Israel when there were no settlements and they devoted worry attacks against Israel when there were settlements.