Style Switcher

Predefined Colors

Can the Government Run the Economy?

Can the Government Run the Economy?

With the most intelligent professionals and also the very best financial experts, could the federal government run the UNITED STATE economic climate? Could it maintain America’s $17 trillion economic climate going like a well-oiled device? Steve Forbes, Chairman and also Editor- in-Chief of Forbes Media, discusses why no person individual or team can “run” the economic climate, and also why any kind of effort to do so can just make points even worse. Donate today to Prager U! JoiningPrager U is complimentary! Sign up currently to obtain all our video clips as quickly as they’re launched. DownloadPragerpedia on your apple iphone or Android! Thousands of resources and also realities within your reaches. apple iphone: Android: JoinPrager United to obtain brand-new boodle every quarter, unique very early accessibility to our video clips, and also a yearly TownHall call with Dennis Prager! JoinPrager U’s message checklist to have these video clips, complimentary goods free gifts and also damaging statements sent out straight to your phone! Do you go shopping on Amazon? Click and also a percent of every Amazon acquisition will certainly be contributed to Prager U. Same terrific items. Same small cost. Shopping made purposeful. CHECK OUT Prager U! FOLLOW us! Facebook: Twitter: Instagram: Prager U gets on Snapchat! SIGN UP WITH Prager REQUIRE! ForStudents: SgPaX. JOIN our Educators Network! Script:. Is our economic climate a maker, like a car, a train or a nuclear power plant? One regularly listens to expressions such as the economic climate “is overheating” or “requires to cool down” or “might make use of some stimulation.” These aren’t safe allegories. They exemplify exactly how financial experts have actually shown us to see an economic climate– as something that can be controlled, directed or driven. And assumption that does the driving? The federal government. The federal government is expected to ensure that the economic climate “hums” along at an also rate, going neither also rapid neither also slow-moving. But the economic climate is not a maker. It is composed of individuals, and also no person can regulate what billions of them are mosting likely to do. What obtains ignored, minimized or just overlooked is the phenomenal “spin” in the tasks of a free enterprise. New organisations open while others close, regularly. In the UNITED STATE throughout typical times a half-million or even more tasks are produced every week, while an additional half-million are reduced. Entrepreneurs consistently present brand-new services and products, a lot of which flop. But those that do well can considerably enhance our lifestyle. What federal government can and also must do is to favorably affect the atmosphere in which this hum of task happens via reasonable taxes, financial plan, federal government costs and also guideline. And in nearly all circumstances the very best prescription for financial health and wellness is “much less is extra.”. Catastrophic errors by federal governments can poisonous substance the industry, as occurred throughout the Great Depression in the 1930 s, to a lower degree in the 1970 s, and afterwards once again in the panic of 2008–09 The federal government’s current errors have actually been worsened by tax obligation boosts and also an avalanche of antigrowth guidelines from ObamaCare, the Dodd-Frank economic solutions costs and also all those Washington governing firms, such as the FCC, the EPA and also the National Labor RelationsBoard If you intend to comprehend why the American economic climate has actually been expanding at the anemic speed of 1 to 2 percent a year, look no more. Again, the concept of an economic climate that purrs along like a well-oiled device harms, not improves, wide range production due to the fact that inevitably, it brings about development hampering federal government treatment. Which brings us to bubbles. Shouldn’ t the federal government, the debate goes, a minimum of attempt to quit them from occurring? Well, it depends. Those brought on by misdirected federal government plans like the real estate bubble of the mid 2000’s, yes. Those brought on by the free enterprise, no. Bubbles have a poor name, however not every one of them are produced equivalent. There are healthy and balanced ones and also undesirable ones. The excellent kind establishes when a great deal of individuals concurrently identify an excellent chance. Computers are a superb instance. During the very early 1980 s there was a boom in desktop computers– complied with by a serious shakeout, when business such as Atari and also Commodore little bit the dirt. In the late 1990 s a variety of business acknowledged the value of online search engine. Google arised supreme with Microsoft and also others delegated to fractional market shares. For the total manuscript, see
sourcePosted in Economy


MsKempinsky - posted on November 18, 2018 3:04 pm

Actually, the USSR and the entire Warsaw Union are enough proof why government shouldn't rule the economy.

And China, while identifying as communist, is hyper-capitalistic.

Joint Unity - posted on December 19, 2018 12:19 am

They promise to be apart of the economy and growth. But Are the competent enough to do it? Solve economic issues and get rid of inhumane things like poverty and create more equal opportunities.

Joint Unity - posted on December 19, 2018 12:20 am

Less jobs is more? I would have to dis agree with “less is more”

Pedro Exposito - posted on January 9, 2019 4:03 pm

Actually, there are essential roles for government in the economy AND society.
Regulations are absolutely necessary to protect the health and welfare of the population.
With 80,000+ industrial chemicals in the environment, who will protect the people from harm ?
Will companies police themselves to be good citizens ? no. If something is not illegal, then it is legal and will be done.
Companies exists to generate a profit, not to be charities and not to be good citizens.
If a science or technology is too immature to generate a profit in the foreseeable future, business will not support it.
Even venture capitalists needs to see light at the end of a fairly short tunnel.
Government needs to incubate fundamental science and technology. No one else will…
Government control of the business cycle has decreased the depth and highs of recessions and booms.
In the 1800s, hundreds of banks would fail in any downturn. Many people lost life savings when banks failed.
Today, banks are supervised from excessive lending; hence, accounts are guaranteed by govnt.
The 2008 financial crisis was caused by exotic financial instruments due to deregulation of banks in 1998.
When lender were allowed to resell packaged loans to other investors, they did not care about the quality of the loans they were making. Basically, give a loan to anybody with a pulse.

CHill TACtics - posted on January 19, 2019 10:27 am

In private industry if u dont produce ur out of a job but in government it doesnt matter how much u mess up ull always have a job so there is no incentive to do better

Dan Jakubik - posted on January 23, 2019 10:00 am

No! Unless one desires socialism.

Dan Jakubik - posted on January 23, 2019 10:02 am

Many world wide historical examples of socialism failing on a grand scale since Russia in 1917 to Venezuela in 2019! Learn from history people!

ocMito - posted on February 12, 2019 5:40 am

it already has

Petr Zeman - posted on February 25, 2019 4:51 pm

We were trying it for 40 yrs, nope. Stay aware of that.

M Gonzo - posted on March 17, 2019 5:17 pm

If Prager U is going to be simplelistic with their misinformation, then it was "Too Big Too Fail" banks, bankers and insurance firms with their bad loan derivatives caused the 2008 financial crisis, not the "government pushing bad loans to lower class people".

Oru Tamizhan - posted on March 18, 2019 7:49 pm

I have a genuine question to ask. Many of the videos from prageru suggests that government must not interfere with private market. If such is the case then who guarantees security. Do we not need an assurance certificate to let know the product or service is safe?? Will it not lead to raise in more number of people like Jordan Belfort or Bernie Madoff?

Hobby428 - posted on March 31, 2019 9:31 pm


Integrated - posted on April 9, 2019 8:51 pm

Tariffs are anti-free market too

hbarudi - posted on April 12, 2019 5:14 am

Good video about this situation with the government and economy, the US national debt will be much less if government did not intervene in the economy.

James Bancroft - posted on April 13, 2019 9:25 pm

govt spending should only be for the military; there should be no regulation (except upon companies under govt contract or in cases of fraud); there should be no welfare state; there should be no subsidies or bailouts; there should only be an LVT & the pre-1913 method of apportioning said taxation to population by the federal govt should be restored (i.e. state govts should collect the LVT & then give some of the proceeds to the federal gov’t); there should be no central bank (only free banking—but perhaps w/ a Hamiltonian NATIONAL bank) & banks should issue their own banknotes (where they would also agree to accept one another’s notes) backed by their reserves of gold and silver specie (both of which are minted by the US Mint, & freely-coinable there (w/ only refinement fees) & w/ international agreements leading to the ratio of gold to silver returning to the historical levels (anywhere from 1:9 to 1:16))

Tenzin Tendar - posted on May 5, 2019 5:38 pm

Without regulation, giant companies will become monopoly that can exploit consumers.

James Ataman - posted on May 9, 2019 6:44 pm

How about the economic train wreak called the obama administration. 8 years of a flat 401K no groth. Proof of bad leader ship.

Paulo A. Bollosa - posted on May 22, 2019 6:04 am

Due to the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines, our economy along with our government are being held and controlled by the Evil Oligarchs, putting some restrictions to Foreign Direct Investors to invest in our country by implementing 60/40 Foreign and Local Business ventures. All countries around the world don't have this restrictions, probably there's some. And our constitution also have pork barrel, PDAF, that creates gridlock and corrupt politicians. You may see that our country is somehow progressive but our economy here is being monopolized by the oligarchs, which the effect, leaving the poor, drowning in poverty, while the elite's and higher social class are dragging themselves to richness. Since our constitution have a Unitary-Presidential form of government, having a Unitary territorial Administration, makes our the capital of the Philippines, the central of our government became more congested, because it has a higher wage rate compare to the other provinces having lower wage rate that the people from the other provinces are moving to the central/capital seeking for better opportunity. And with Presidential form of government, our kind of election here became a personality based, leaving behind their political platforms and programs valuable every campaign, and political dynasties became so rampant, and with that vote buying emerge, and our Opposition here is being obstructionist and somehow not being reliable. That is why our recent administration are pushing constitutional reform, advocating the FEDERAL-PARLIAMENTARY form of government and abolishing the restrictions to FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTORS, by removing the 60/40 rule so we can have a FREE ECONOMY.

Justriezing - posted on May 25, 2019 9:07 pm

Higher increased government spending has proven to increase the economy for a small amount of time, so economists (Keynes) say to save during booms and spend during dips in order to help out

chespokotota - posted on June 2, 2019 7:06 pm

Can google, Twitter and Facebook regulate themselves and abstain themselves from censoring the people?

Can videogame industry regulate themselves and stop emulating casinos instead of producing games?

Can media companies regulate themselves and abstain from pushing degenerate jewish propaganda into the masses?

Also Forbes is a cryptobolshevik propaganda producer.

chespokotota - posted on June 2, 2019 7:09 pm

Protectionism > free trade

Also markets are a state policy which is not bad for financing the nation's military machine it was deviced by aristocrats to efficiently pay their troops and manage wealth.

I say we hang those capitalist parasites and restore aristocratic military rule.

Kyn Chan - posted on July 17, 2019 9:28 pm

Unfortunately, previously capitalist countries are becoming socialist ones with all these rules, government continually increasing welfare, making tax rules very complicated and destroying all industry.

Dan Stewart - posted on August 10, 2019 12:12 am

I was distracted from an otherwise agreeable message by the fact that Steve Forbes was a huge supporter of TARP and Federal Reserve bailout of the big banks in 2008/09, instead of letting free market disciple resolve the issue.

To be fair, Steve was likely heavily invested in Citi, JPM, Goldman and Morgan Stanley, and his personal self interest trumped his publicly professed free market principles.

Dan Stewart - posted on August 10, 2019 12:16 am

Managing the economy is like managing evolution.

musicmansuperman - posted on August 15, 2019 2:07 pm

Trump's presidency has confirmed the veracity of this presentation. Spot ON, Mr. Prager!

Darryl Jackson - posted on August 19, 2019 12:32 am

We need people like him in charge of everything.

Stupid Storm - posted on August 28, 2019 1:20 am

The gov can't even deliver the mail.

archetypique - posted on September 12, 2019 1:19 am


halas - posted on September 12, 2019 7:49 pm

The Federal Reserve controls our purse strings. They control interest rates and have no accountability.

Post a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.