Does Free Speech Offend You?|5 Minute Video

Should offensive speech be prohibited? Where should we, as a society, draw the line where permitted speech is on one side, and prohibited speech is on the other? And should launch speech be limited by things like trigger warnings and penalties for microaggressions?

PragerU is experiencing severe censorship on Big Tech platforms. Go to https://www.prageru.com/ to enjoy our videos free from censorship!

SUBSCRIBE https://www.prageru.com/join/

Take PragerU videos with you everywhere you go. Download our complimentary mobile app!
Download for Apple iOS ➡ https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/prage …
Download for Android ➡ https://play.google.com/store/apps/de …

Join PragerU’s text list! https://optin.mobiniti.com/prageru

Love PragerU? Visit our shop today!

Script:

Flexibility of speech. Most of us who live in liberal Western democracies think of it as a standard human. Now we may be in risk of losing it.

The threat is not originating from without– from external opponents– but from within. A generation is being raised not to believe in liberty OF speech, nevertheless rather that they need to have flexibility FROM speech– from speech they do not like. This is a risk to both pluralism and democracy itself.

We see this in Europe where “sensitivity-based” censorship efforts to forbid anything deemed despiteful or even just upsetting, and to ban criticism of faiths, particularly Islam.
The United States, in spite of its strong Constitutional defenses in the Bill of Rights is far from immune from the rising pattern of suppression of speech, or what is in some cases called political accuracy. This is specifically genuine at America’s universities and colleges, the location where our future leaders are notified and where you ‘d anticipate speech to be the most completely complimentary.

Incredibly restrictive speech codes are now the norm on schools, not the exception. According to a study by my company, the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education– FIRE– 54% of public universities and 59% of personal universities impose political accuracy speech codes on their students. And thanks to existing Department of Education requirements 100% of colleges may embrace speech codes in the coming years.

How bad is it?

At a public school in California on Constitution Day in 2013, a trainee who likewise occurs to be an embellished military veteran was informed he might not disperse copies of the Constitution to his fellow students. The objection from the university was not ideological; it was out of control bureaucracy enforcing restrictions on speech.

That very same day another university student because specific very same state was informed he might not oppose NSA security beyond a small “complimentary speech zone,” a location that made up just 1.37% of the school.

Months later on, college student in Hawaii were informed both they may not give out the constitution to their fellow trainees which they might not object NSA policies outside the school’s complimentary speech zone! FIRE took these colleges to court, nevertheless the that truth we needed to shows you how bad it has in fact ended up being.

Simply recently, trainees and supportive teachers have in fact joined forces to overlook school speakers whose viewpoints they do not like. At FIRE we call this “disinvitation season” although the season lasts throughout the year.

Thinking about that 2009 there has been a substantial uptick in the push by students and professors to get speakers they do not like disinvited. Couple of conservative speakers are invited to speak at colleges lest they have to be “disinivited” later.

For the complete script, have a look at https://www.prageru.com/videos/does-free-speech-offend-you

source

Where should we, as a society, draw the line where allowed speech is on one side, and prohibited speech is on the other? A generation is being raised not to think in versatility OF speech, however rather that they require to have flexibility FROM speech– from speech they do not like.

Where should we, as a society, draw the line where permitted speech is on one side, and restricted speech is on the other? A generation is being raised not to believe in liberty OF speech, nevertheless rather that they should have flexibility FROM speech– from speech they do not like. Where should we, as a society, draw the line where allowed speech is on one side, and forbade speech is on the other? A generation is being raised not to think in versatility OF speech, however rather that they need to have versatility FROM speech– from speech they do not like. According to a research study by my business, the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education– FIRE– 54% of public universities and 59% of personal universities impose politically correct speech codes on their students.