Follow the Science

Brian Keating is an astrophysicist at a major university. Science is his life. When he hears someone say to” follow the science,” he gets nervous. Because that’s not how science works. And never has.

Follow Brian on social networks:
https://www.youtube.com/DrBrianKeating?sub_confirmation=1

https://instagram.com/DrBrianKeating

Buy his book: http://amzn.to/2sa5UpA
Enjoy The Book Club: https://www.prageru.com/presenter/brian-keating

FOLLOW PragerU!

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/prageru.
Twitter: https://twitter.com/prageru.
Instagram: https://instagram.com/prageru/.

SUBSCRIBE https://www.prageru.com/join/.

To see the script, sources, test, check out: https://www.prageru.com/video/follow-the-science.

Join PragerU’s text list! https://optin.mobiniti.com/prageru.

Do you shop on Amazon? Click https://smile.amazon.com and a portion of every Amazon purchase will be contributed to PragerU.

SHOP!

Love PragerU? Visit our shop today! https://shop.prageru.com/.

Script:.

I’m an astrophysicist at a significant university. Science is my life. But when I hear somebody somberly intone, “science says” or “follow the science,” I get extremely worried..

Science does not come from any ideology. Science is the never-ending search for brand-new knowledge.

That’s what science indicates in Latin, by the way– understanding. Not social policy. Understanding.

Understanding, it turns out, isn’t so easy to come by. When we’re standing on it) turns out not to be so certain, and sometimes what we believe we understand for particular (the earth sure does look flat.

Naturally, I trust in fundamental scientific realities– those things for which there is overwhelming proof like, state, gravity; even that people contribute in the warming of the world.

Scientists– even the finest ones– can get things incorrect.

The fantastic astrophysicist Sir Fred Hoyle thought deep space existed in a steady state permanently and had no beginning. His view, as soon as held sacrosanct by all astrophysicists, no longer holds. It’s been superseded by the Big Bang theory that the universe had a beginning and is still expanding.

In the 20th century, some of the most reputable researchers in the world, consisting of Nobel Prize winners, thought in eugenics– the reprehensible idea that the human race might be improved by selective breeding. No respectable scientist would have anything to do with this idea.

We all require to get over this concept that just since someone– be it a political leader, a bureaucrat, or even a researcher– uses the phrase “science says” means whatever they’re saying is.

It might likewise be incorrect. And if it’s wrong, it will not necessarily be a bunch of researchers who state it’s incorrect.

Ask Einstein. One hundred researchers wrote a book describing why his theory of relativity was wrong. He quipped, “If I were incorrect, then one would’ve been enough.”.

It takes a lot to convince scientists to accept a new theory, especially if that new theory refutes what they have actually always thought– in some cases, what they’ve staked their entire careers on. As Richard Feynman, one of the most noteworthy physicists of the 20th century, famously said, “Science is the belief in the lack of knowledge of specialists …” What Feynman is saying is that a good scientist must always preserve a healthy amount of skepticism. Science is, by its nature, provisional. Science would stagnate if we merely accepted proclamations of previous authorities..

So how do we do excellent science? This is not a brand-new question. Considering that the 17th century, scientists have employed the so-called scientific technique to guide their work. It’s not an ideal guide by any means, however it’s quite darn great..

The method includes: 1. Formulating a theory. 2. If the theory is real, anticipating the proof that ought to be found. 3. Collecting data. 4. Evaluating the information. 5. Refining the theory and presenting evidence to other specialists..

The thinker Karl Popper included another item to this list. Popper stated that a subject is scientific if, and just if, it can be falsified. In other words, if your theory can’t be evaluated– if it can’t be proven wrong, it’s probably not good science..

Designs are predictions of the future based on existing information. They can quickly get things incorrect.

Of all, the future (in case you had not seen) is very difficult to anticipate. And the additional out you enter into the future, the less protect the prediction.

For the total script go to https://www.prageru.com/video/follow-the-science.

source

When he hears someone state to” follow the science,” he gets anxious. Because that’s not how science works. That’s what science means in Latin, by the way– understanding. As Richard Feynman, one of the most distinguished physicists of the 20th century, notoriously said, “Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts …” What Feynman is saying is that a good researcher ought to always keep a healthy amount of hesitation. How do we do excellent science?