How to Steal an Election: Mail-In Ballots What’s the differe…
How to Steal an Election: Mail-In Ballots
What’s the difference between absentee balloting and universal mail-in balloting? Eric Eggers of the Government Accountability Institute addresses this critically important concern.
FOLLOW us!
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/prageru.
Twitter: https://twitter.com/prageru.
Instagram: https://instagram.com/prageru/.
SUBSCRIBE so you never ever miss out on a new video! https://www.prageru.com/join/.
To view the script, sources, test, go to https://www.prageru.com/video/how-to-steal-an-election-mail-in-ballots.
Sign up with PragerU’s text list to have these videos, completely free item free gifts and breaking declarations sent directly to your phone! https://optin.mobiniti.com/prageru.
Do you go shopping on Amazon? Click https://smile.amazon.com and a part of every Amazon purchase will be contributed to PragerU.
SHOP!
Love PragerU? Now you can use PragerU merchandise!
SIGN UP WITH PragerFORCE!
For Students: http://l.prageru.com/2aozfkP.
JOIN our Educators Network! http://l.prageru.com/2aoz2y9.
Script:.
Is there an issue with universal mail-in balloting?.
Sounds simple enough: You submit a tally, stick it in the mail; somebody counts it on Election Day. We currently do that with absentee tallies? So why would universal mail-in balloting be any different?.
Well, the most considerable difference is that with absentee tallies, the citizen especially asks for a tally.
With universal mail-in balloting, tallies are sent by mail out en masse. Millions of individuals who would generally go to the surveys vote by mail instead.
No nationwide election has actually ever been performed by doing this. And there are great factors to be concerned that a person ever need to.
Aspect # 1:.
Governmental incompetence.
I do not think I need to sell you on the concept that when the federal government bureaucracy takes on a huge brand-new project with little preparation, the outcomes aren’t rather. We’ve seen those results as it connects to mail-in balloting currently.
Wisconsin was amongst the very first states to hold a main in the coronavirus age. It saw an increase in mail-in votes as an outcome. Naturally, this resulted in extreme snafus: Thousands of asked for tallies were not sent out; 1,600 tallies were found in a mail processing center the day after the election; 23,000 votes were refused due to missing signatures or other missing out on info.
And those are the errors we comprehend about in simply one state and in one main election, when fewer individuals than in the standard election normally trouble to cast a vote.
In Pennsylvania, where they delayed the date of their main to improve gotten ready for the expected increase in mail-in balloting, they still couldn’t deal with the volume. Half of Philadelphia’s votes were still uncounted a week after the election.
In Virginia, bulk a million applications for ballots were sent by mail with incorrect info. A few of the applications went to the inaccurate addresses, some went to dead voters, one even went to a pet.
Under the very best of scenarios, the administration has issue with mail-in balloting. Under less than the best of situations? That’s not a scenario we wish to deal with.
Which brings us to aspect # 2 for concern: second-rate security.
Here’s what the New York Times stated about voting by mail in a short post in 2012. Keep in mind, they were going over standard absentee balloting, not a mass-mailing of tallies.
” There is a bipartisan agreement that tally by mail, whatever its effect, is more quickly mistreated than other kinds.”.
No joking.
In May 2020, New Jersey performed its very first all-mail election. One month later on, 2 chosen officials were amongst four charged with criminal conduct including mail-in tallies. One personnel admitted to taking tallies, both finished and uncompleted, out of mail boxes. Other operatives put together a database of signatures of potential voters, and after that utilized them to complete tallies on behalf of their chosen candidates.
Considering that they got captured, and we only comprehend about it.
Election rip-offs simply figures to get much easier due to the fact that of a new weapon in the cheater’s arsenal– tally harvesting. This is the term for when a 3rd party– typically a job worker or activist– goes to individuals’s homes and collects their tallies.
With tally harvesting, you do not even need to put your tally in the mail box; vote harvesters will select it up for you. The opportunities for mischief– state, pushing people to vote a specific technique, destroying tallies, or finishing tallies for those who didn’t trouble to vote– are unlimited.
Vote harvesting that targets senior people for their tallies even has its own name: “granny farming.”.
Factor # 3 to be fretted:.
The possibility of long hold-ups in determining outcomes.
For the complete script check out https://www.prageru.com/video/how-to-steal-an-election-mail-in-ballots.
source
Sounds basic enough: You fill out a tally, stick it in the mail; somebody counts it on Election Day. One personnel admitted to taking tallies, both completed and uncompleted, out of mail boxes.
Naturally, this led to serious snafus: Thousands of asked for tallies were not sent out; 1,600 tallies were found in a mail processing center the day after the election; 23,000 votes were turned down due to missing signatures or other missing details.
One month later, 2 chosen authorities were among four charged with criminal conduct consisting of mail-in tallies. One workers confessed to taking tallies, both ended up and uncompleted, out of mail boxes. Sounds simple enough: You fill out a tally, stick it in the mail; somebody counts it on Election Day. One workers confessed to taking tallies, both finished and uncompleted, out of mail boxes.
