Is Harvard Racist?|5 Minute Video
Harvard University’s admissions policy is proof that one can keep in mind negative history, blog about it in excellent and vibrant information, and still be doomed to duplicate it. In the name of “affirmative action” and “variety,” Harvard is doing to Asian-American applicants exactly what it when did to Jewish candidates: discriminate. Lee Cheng discusses.
Contribute today to PragerU! http://l.prageru.com/2eB2p0h
To view the test, script, and study guides, see https://www.prageru.com/video/is-harvard-racist
CHECK OUT PragerU! https://www.prageru.com
Get PragerU bonus offer material free of charge! https://www.prageru.com/bonus-content
Sign Up With Prager United to get new boodle every quarter, unique early access to our videos, and a yearly TownHall telephone call with Dennis Prager! http://l.prageru.com/2c9n6ys
Sign up with PragerU’s text list to have these videos, free merchandise giveaways and breaking announcements sent straight to your phone! https://optin.mobiniti.com/prageru
Do you shop on Amazon? Click https://smile.amazon.com and a portion of every Amazon purchase will be contributed to PragerU.
FOLLOW us!
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/prageru
Twitter: https://twitter.com/prageru
Instagram: https://instagram.com/prageru/
PragerU is on Snapchat!
STORE!
Love PragerU? Now you can wear PragerU merchandise! Visit our shop today! https://shop.prageru.com/
JOIN PragerFORCE!
For Students: http://l.prageru.com/2aozfkP
JOIN our Educators Network! http://l.prageru.com/2aoz2y9
Script:
Can you picture, in this day and age, an educational institution victimizing a racial minority? Can you picture what the outcry would be?
” You suggest, you’re preventing these qualified students from attending your college due to the fact that of the color of their skin?!”.
Well, you do not need to envision it. It’s taking place. And at arguably the most prestigious college in America– my university, Harvard.
The ethnic minority isn’t blacks or Jews, as it remained in years past. The target this time is Asian Americans.
And it’s simply as wrong.
After millions of dollars in legal fees, millions of records taken a look at, and numerous hours of depositions and statement, Harvard’s as soon as purposely nontransparent admissions policies have actually been laid bare. It’s not a beautiful photo.
Here’s what we now understand:.
Harvard Admissions rates student applicants in three main methods: 1) Academic efficiency; 2) Extra-curricular accomplishments; 3) “Personal qualities.” That’s fine, as far as it goes, if the criteria were applied relatively. However they’re not.
Asian American candidates consistently score higher in the very first 2 criteria– academics and extra-curricular activities, which can be objectively examined– than white students, Latinos and African Americans.
How does Harvard validate its Asian American quota? With the aid of classification 3–” personal qualities,” that include largely subjective and unclear factors like “likability,” “maturity,” “integrity,” and “effervescence.”.
According to Harvard’s own internal reports, Asian American applicants are regularly and methodically marked much lower on this personality scale by Harvard admissions officers who nearly never meet or talk to candidates. Here’s the kicker: the personality ratings provided to Asian students by admissions officers are significantly various than the character scores Harvard gets from its own alumni job interviewers, who actually satisfy the applicants in individual. Alumni interviewers score Asian candidates as high as whites.
In other words, Harvard artificially and fraudulently downgrades Asians on “character” to get the outcomes it wants. And what Harvard wants is to suppress the variety of Asian Americans admitted.
Based upon the data that Harvard was forced to turn over, economist Peter Arcidiacono of Duke University concluded that with the very same application profile in regards to test ratings, extracurricular activities and personality factors, an Asian American male applicant would only have a 25% possibility of admission– versus 32% if white, 77% if Hispanic, and 95% if black.
What’s the real-life result of all this?
In 2013, Asian Americans comprised 19% of the inbound freshmen class. According to Harvard’s own Office of Institutional Research, if the personality aspects had actually not been rigged, that percentage would have been 43%.
For the complete script, go to https://www.prageru.com/video/is-harvard-racist.
source
Harvard University’s admissions policy is proof that one can remember unfavorable history, compose about it in vibrant and fantastic detail, and still be doomed to duplicate it. In the name of “affirmative action” and “diversity,” Harvard is doing to Asian-American candidates exactly what it when did to Jewish applicants: discriminate. And at probably the most prestigious college in America– my alma mater, Harvard.
According to Harvard’s own internal reports, Asian American candidates are consistently and systematically significant much lower on this character scale by Harvard admissions officers who nearly never fulfill or interview applicants. Here’s the kicker: the character scores offered to Asian trainees by admissions officers are significantly different than the character ratings Harvard gets from its own alumni interviewers, who in fact fulfill the candidates in individual.
