Misconceptions, Lies and Capitalism|5 Minute Video

Does totally free company hurt the bad? In 5 minutes, Arthur Brooks responds to these concerns and more about commercialism.

PragerU is experiencing serious censorship on Big Tech platforms. Go to https://www.prageru.com/ to enjoy our videos without censorship!

SUBSCRIBE https://www.prageru.com/join/

Take PragerU videos with you all over you go. Download our free mobile app!
Download for Apple iOS ➡ https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/prage …
Download for Android ➡ https://play.google.com/store/apps/de …

Join PragerU’s text list! https://optin.mobiniti.com/prageru

STORE! Love PragerU? Visit our shop today! https://shop.prageru.com/

Script:

Here are 5 myths about free enterprise.

Mistaken Belief Number One. Commercialism damages the bad.

The part of the world’s population living on the equivalent of less than a dollar a day has really fallen by more than 80 percent since 1970.

This was not the result of foreign aid or U.N. advancement projects. It was the spread of capitalism that achieved this wonder. In China alone, free market and foreign investment– financial investment, not help– lifted 400 million Chinese out of abject poverty in simply the 20 years between 1981 and 2001.

There has in fact never been a force for assisting the bad that has come close to capitalism.

Misconception Number Two. Capitalism is driven by greed.

They ‘d be far better off getting a safe task in civil service if service owners were whatever about cash. According to an existing study by Careerbuilder.com, small-business owners made 19 percent less cash each year than government supervisors.

Company owner are driven by an intense desire to handle their own destiny. They pursue something I call “made success.”

For some individuals, made success indicates company success; for others, it suggests raising excellent kids, developing a not-for-profit, or making lovely art– whatever permits people to produce worth in their lives and in the lives of others.

Just capitalism gives them the individual freedom to do that.

Mistaken Belief Number Three. Commercialism types envy.

Because 1973, the General Social Survey has actually asked Americans whether they think good luck or effort is more vital in getting ahead. For 40 years, in between 60 and 70 percent of Americans have really chosen “effort.” In an existing poll, the Pew Research Center found that 88 percent of Americans said they appreciated individuals who get plentiful by striving.

This view is distinct to the United States. According the World Values Survey, Americans are most likely than those of other nations to associate success to effort. Americans are two times as most likely to do so than the French.

In a society that rewards effort and offers chance, commercialism promotes goal and goal. It is in societies that have much less monetary liberty and far less business owners and for that reason financial stagnancy that you find envy, bitterness, and often unrest. This holds true in Europe, where individuals require a growing number of federal government benefits rather of demanding to keep more of what they make.

Misconception Number Four. Free enterprise activated the Great Recession.

It wasn’t capitalism that was at fault; it was the absence of capitalism. Statism and its co-dependent spouse– corporate cronyism– melted down our economy.

As my American Enterprise Institute associate Peter Wallison has in fact recorded, twenty years of misguided federal government policy produced the conditions that led to the property bubble. Big corporations, consisting of vehicles and truck organization, big banks, and the government-backed home mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

This isn’t the free enterprise at work– not even close. It’s a harmful mix of huge federal government and its business customers. The service is more industrialism: where entrepreneurs put their cash on the line and make a revenue or suffer a loss.

For the overall script, go to https://www.prageru.com/videos/myths-lies-and-capitalism

source

Does absolutely capitalism hurt the poor? It was the spread of totally capitalism that achieved this miracle. In China alone, absolutely open market and foreign financial investment– investment, not aid– raised 400 million Chinese out of abject challenge in merely the 20 years between 1981 and 2001.

In a society that rewards effort and uses chance, complimentary service cultivates objective and aspiration. The alternative is more capitalism: where entrepreneurs put their money on the line and make a revenue or suffer a loss.

It was the spread of totally free business that attained this miracle. This isn’t the free market at work– not even close. Does absolutely free enterprise injured the poor? It was the spread of absolutely free enterprise that attained this miracle. In China alone, absolutely free trade and foreign investment– investment, not aid– raised 400 million Chinese out of abject challenge in simply the 20 years in between 1981 and 2001.