Pakistan: Can Sharia and Freedom Coexist?|5 Minute Video
Pakistan is the world’s 5th biggest democracy. It is similarly deeply influenced by Islamic law (Sharia). Can these 2 custom-mades, Western Liberal democracy and Sharia, co-exist? If so, how? And if not, what are the impacts? Haroon Ullah, diplomacy instructor at Georgetown University, has some sobering and amazing reactions.
PragerU is experiencing extreme censorship on Big Tech platforms. Go to https://www.prageru.com/ to see our videos devoid of censorship!
SUBSCRIBE https://www.prageru.com/join/
Take PragerU videos with you all over you go. Download our complimentary mobile app!
Download for Apple iOS âž¡ https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/prage …
Download for Android âž¡ https://play.google.com/store/apps/de …
Join PragerU’s text list! https://optin.mobiniti.com/prageru
Love PragerU? Visit our shop today!
Script:
Can you name this country?
It is the 5th largest democracy worldwide. And it’s home to millions of spiritual extremists.
The response, naturally … is Pakistan.
Its unique makeup offers a concern that must preoccupy everyone:
Can two diametrically opposed kind of society– a free one and one based upon religious Sharia Islamic law– exist in one nation?
An incredibly uncomfortable real story supplies us a possible reaction.
On January 4, 2011 Salman Taseer, the previous guv of Punjab, the nation’s most populated province, had lunch with a pal in Kohsar Market, a high end worldwide series of shops and dining establishments. I lived only a few blocks away at the time.
Throughout his profession, Taseer was outspoken in his belief that democracy, pluralism, and flexibility were inseparable, which all religious minorities, need to be safeguarded. Such principles, nevertheless, are anathema to extremists. As a consequence, throughout the years, Taseer had actually gotten many specific death hazards. I understood him. I interviewed him. I hung around with him. He exposed remarkable nerve by refusing to be silenced.
A small crowd had gathered and Taseer waved to them as his driver opened up the rear door. Without caution, a member of Taseer’s own security information advance and opened fire with a maker weapon not more than 10 feet away.
This is how extremists deal with those whom they think of to be a danger– they eliminate them. Our story does not end there.
When the assassin, Mumtaz Qadri, got in the criminal courtroom in Islamabad, he was satisfied by cheering crowds who showered him with flowers. The cheering crowds believed that Taseer had actually truly been worthy of to die. To great deals of Pakistanis, he had really insulted Islam by promoting democracy and liberty for all Pakistanis, no matter their spiritual views, and by protecting the rights of women.
In the following weeks, Pakistan’s Islamic occasions led marches and demonstrations of upward of forty thousand individuals honoring Mumtaz Qadri, the assassin, and commemorating Taseer’s death. They supplied declarations acknowledging Taseer’s assassination, but not one decried the murder and stood of this brave and honorable guy.
It gets worse.
And at Taseer’s funeral service, which I took part in, organizers were not able to discover a single spiritual leader to administer over the occasion. The extremists had actually sent out a clear message: anyone who opposes them may be targeted for death anywhere, and at any time. Stories like this are not unusual in Pakistan.
For the complete script, have a look at https://www.prageru.com/videos/pakistan-can-sharia-and-freedom-coexist
source
Throughout his occupation, Taseer was outspoken in his belief that democracy, liberty, and pluralism were inseparable, which all religious minorities, must be safeguarded. In the following weeks, Pakistan’s Islamic events led marches and discussions of upward of forty thousand people honoring Mumtaz Qadri, the assassin, and honoring Taseer’s death.
Throughout his occupation, Taseer was outspoken in his belief that liberty, democracy, and pluralism were inseparable, which all spiritual minorities, must be secured. In the following weeks, Pakistan’s Islamic occasions led marches and discussions of upward of forty thousand people honoring Mumtaz Qadri, the assassin, and celebrating Taseer’s death.
Throughout his occupation, Taseer was outspoken in his belief that democracy, pluralism, and flexibility were inseparable, which all spiritual minorities, should be secured. As a consequence, throughout the years, Taseer had actually gotten various particular death risks. Throughout his profession, Taseer was outspoken in his belief that democracy, liberty, and pluralism were inseparable, which all religious minorities, need to be secured. Throughout his occupation, Taseer was outspoken in his belief that pluralism, democracy, and liberty were inseparable, and that all spiritual minorities, ought to be safeguarded. In the following weeks, Pakistan’s Islamic events led marches and discussions of upward of forty thousand individuals honoring Mumtaz Qadri, the assassin, and commemorating Taseer’s death.
