Style Switcher

Predefined Colors

DEBATE: Hank Hanegraaff vs. Dr. Mark Hitchcock - Preterism vs. Futurism {Part 1}

DEBATE: Hank Hanegraaff vs. Dr. Mark Hitchcock – Preterism vs. Futurism {Part 1}


Dr Mark Hitchcock as well asMr Hank Hanegraaff argument the day of the Book ofRevelation The argument occurred on December 10, 2007 at the yearly Pre-Trib Study Group conference in Dallas, TX.Dr Hichcock will certainly say for the ADVERTISEMENT 95 day.Mr Hanegraaff will certainly say for the ADVERTISEMENT 65 day. While the ADVERTISEMENT 95 day does not influence the futurist expository technique ofDr Hitchcock’s sight,Mr Hanegraaff preterist sight calls for an ADVERTISEMENT 65 day or his sight of Revelation is made difficult. The argument last for 3 hrs as well as 20 mins. An unique many thanks to John Ankerberg as well as his movie team for recording the occasion.
sourcePosted in John AnkerbergTagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

2 COMMENTS

Understand The Times - posted on February 20, 2020 8:28 am

Unfortunate that hanagraaff defected / apostatized from biblical Christianity 😓

Steve Meikle - posted on February 20, 2020 11:17 am

Jesus Christ returned in the first century? and we all missed it or did not notice it? every eye saw it? it,
His return, was in the same manner as his leaving at the Ascensions (ie physical and visible)? clearly not. Preterism is utterly preposterous.

i do not understand how anyone with a serious grasp of scripture can entertain such a nonsensical idea


Post a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.