Style Switcher

Predefined Colors

Before You Watch Another Matt Dillahunty Debate, WATCH THIS!

Before You Watch Another Matt Dillahunty Debate, WATCH THIS!

If you have actually ever before seen a Matt Dillahunty argument as well as believed he was incorrect however could not determine the mistake, ENJOY THIS VIDEO CLIP! For even more info concerning our Spanish You Tube Channel: SUMMARY # 1[0:27] Mike Winger vs Matt Dillahunty Debate: SUMMARY # 2[8:52] Full video clip of unusual kidnapping: SUMMARY # 3[16:02] “Hume, Holism, as well as Miracles” byDr David Johnson: SUMMARY # 4[16:38] This quote originates from C. S. Lewis’ “Miracles, A Preliminary Study”: SUMMARY # 5[20:07] See my meeting withDr Tim McGrew for much more: SUMMARY # 6[20:13] My meeting withDr Tim McGrew: SUMMARY # 7[20:26] “Hume’s Abject Failure” by John Earman: BT6qz. —————————————— OFFERING ——————————————. Patreon (regular monthly offering): Become a CC Member on You Tube: tFuI_5CArwSmg/ sign up with. One- time Donations: Special many thanks to every one of my advocates for your ongoing assistance as I shift right into permanent ministry with Capturing Christianity! You individuals as well as girls have no suggestion just how much you imply to me. ——————————————– WEB LINKS ——————————————–. Website: Free Christian Apologetics Resources: The Ultimate List of Apologetics Terms for Beginners (with descriptions): ——————————————– SOCIAL ——————————————–. Facebook: Twitter: Instagram: SoundCloud: ——————————————- MY EQUIPMENT ——————————————–. I obtain a great deal of inquiries concerning what equipment I make use of, so right here’s a listing of every little thing I have for streaming as well as recording. The web links listed below are associate (thanks for clicking them!). Camera (Nikon Z6): M1QE. Lens (Nikon 35 mm f/1.4 G): WdyDQ. HDMI Adapter (Cam Link 4K): mUwu. Microphone (Rode NT1): Ma4lk. Audio Interface (midiplus Studio 2): U5u4G. Lights (Neewer 660’s with softboxes): tjk. Color Back Lighting (Hue Smart Lights): ——————————————- CALL ——————————————-. Email: #MattDillahunty #DillahuntyDebate #Evidence
sourcePosted in Mike WingerTagged , , , , , , , , , , , ,


Capturing Christianity - posted on March 3, 2020 1:33 pm

Note: If you want to disagree with something I say in the video, that’s fine (and even welcome). But please at least attempt to watch the video and understand the points being made. That’s all I ask 🙂

宇宙不思議な - posted on April 8, 2020 7:34 pm

According to dilahunty and the atheists who disliked, people who have been raped have no evidence, their statement and the statement of witnesses apparently don't count as evidence anymore 🤦🤦

Adriano Seresi - posted on April 8, 2020 8:32 pm

Yes. Christianity is true. I have experienced it.

some one - posted on April 8, 2020 9:08 pm

@capturing christianity A "reasonable assertion" as you put it is still not evidence of the thing asserted. Now for mundane things this is fine (though still not evidence) because you already know they exist, however thats not what we're talking about. Your daughter claiming to have seen something doesn't mean it actually happened, otherwise when people claim to have seen ghosts and bigfoot we'd take them seriously.

4:57 Getting 2nd or 3rd hand accounts of something is already not evidence for the reason stated above plus now you're dealing with extra variables as you're not even talking to the person who had the experience. This is a problem given that the bible ONLY contains 2nd or 3rd hand accounts. Correct me if I'm wrong but in a court of law 2nd and 3rd hand accounts are no longer considered eyewitness accounts (not that eyewitness accounts are very good in the first place as any lawyer will tell you) and would instead be dismissed as hearsay a.k.a. rumors.

7:28 is a moot point given that claims don't qualify for evidence anyway

For your facebook post: "My Dillahunty video is making the rounds in the skeptical community. Its currently at 250 downvotes (actually somewhat of a record). Means its reaching the right people."
It may be reaching the right people but if you listen to them they think you're wrong and lay out reasons as I have. People aren't convinced by you because your 23 minute video is proven wrong by a few paragraphs in a youtube comment.

The Riff Writer - posted on April 9, 2020 4:16 am

So, by your own rationale, if someone really, reeeeeally believes something, that alone makes it a reasonable claim? Does that mean it's not possible for a person to be mistaken? Based on nothing more than the level of their passion? What if they're in a mental institution? Or just haven't been diagnosed yet? What about that kid we all went to school with who habitually told tall tales? Sometimes he even pinky promised or (gasp) swore to God!
Utterly putting religion, superstition and the supernatural aside, you have such a low standard of evidence, without a hint of sarcasm, I'm not sure if I'd trust your word if you said you seen a child skin his knee.

Jay Kline - posted on April 9, 2020 11:48 am

"Some claims can provide some evidence." You've said this three times without providing an example of a claim that can do that. Do you have an example of a claim that provides some evidence?

Jay Kline - posted on April 9, 2020 11:49 am

Miraculous claims are extraordinary claims and extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Hearsay is not extraordinary, even if it is written down.

Jay Kline - posted on April 9, 2020 12:08 pm

You should watch the the Paulogia video. That how honest people with no motives or preconceived notions talk.

cheky monkey - posted on April 9, 2020 1:11 pm

cc should have been a tap dancer

Bothell Guy - posted on April 9, 2020 1:28 pm

The thing you think is wrong is the fact that the logic he provides us both sound and destroys your belief. That's that feeling. Sorry you aren't honest enough with yourself to recognize that and instead made a video showing just how far you will bury your head up your own ass to avoid the fact that Matt wins debate after debate with easy logic.

Todd Crosby - posted on April 9, 2020 6:52 pm

Wow, you really screwed that’ up! You literally state manned Matt’s statement then complained about the condition of the straw man you yourself just constructed. Then you tried to get cute about it and thought you were more clever then too were and made yourself look like a twit.
You seem like a nice person who CAN reason, you just opted not to when looking at Matt’s statement regarding claims. This stuff is simple and covered within the first two weeks of debate training on our school, so I trust you will figure it out.

Aaron Dunlap - posted on April 10, 2020 6:17 pm

Sounds like you've proved that aliens exist

nandawula elizabeth - posted on April 10, 2020 11:18 pm

I wonder what “ Just claims not evidence means” because if a claim is just an assertion then I might need him to explain if he is a person and if then he is a person then present the evidence to prove his claim to me. To say you are a person is just a claim. Thanks for this video because I was having these questions while watching the debate. I am so disappointed that the comment section on that video shows that mike’s evidence were just claims and yet Matt was making statements that did not make sense at all unless you just want to be a skeptic.

Professor B - posted on April 11, 2020 2:19 am

Matt always makes a ton of sense.

Dave - posted on April 11, 2020 2:01 pm

Evidence IS evidence……

Frank Kelley - posted on April 11, 2020 5:02 pm

Is this best the liars for Christ can come up with? Pathetic display.

colzbroeffect boss - posted on April 12, 2020 7:16 am

When you contrast unreasonable assertions with reasonable assertions, you're essentially doing the same thing Matt does to point out why some claims require different standards of evidence. We aren't going to need buckets of evidence for mundane claims, but extrodinary claims will need extrodinary amounts of evidence. If you tell me you have a garden, I'll probably believe you. If you tell me you have a garden with super plants that grow 30 feet up into the air, I'd need to see proof.

However, both claims require evidence, even if we might be more willing to accept one over the other without evidence. A claim on its own is not evidence.

Oscar Rivera - posted on April 12, 2020 8:29 am

MT is just a rethoricist and semantics player.

Oscar Rivera - posted on April 12, 2020 8:34 am

I think that many people failed to deal with MD strategy and words play with "evidence", "claims", etc. You are falling in his rhetoric play.

Aaron Dunlap - posted on April 12, 2020 10:23 am

For those interested in Matt's rebuttal

SundayMatinee - posted on April 12, 2020 7:56 pm

Hey man, you should believe in aliens.

Post a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.