The Popular Vote vs. the Electoral College|5 Minute Video
Now, there’s a well-organized, below-the-radar effort to render the Electoral College successfully useless. It’s called the National Popular Vote, and it would turn our governmental elections into a majority-rule affair.
PragerU is experiencing severe censorship on Big Tech platforms. Go to https://www.prageru.com/ to see our videos devoid of censorship!
SUBSCRIBE https://www.prageru.com/join/
Take PragerU videos with you all over you go. Download our complimentary mobile app!
Download for Apple iOS ➡ https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/prage …
Download for Android ➡ https://play.google.com/store/apps/de …
Join PragerU’s text list! https://optin.mobiniti.com/prageru
STORE! Love PragerU? Visit our shop today! https://shop.prageru.com/
Script:
In every presidential election, just one concern matters: which prospect will get the 270 votes needed to win the Electoral College?
Our Founders so deeply feared a tyranny of the bulk that they declined the idea of a direct choose President. That’s why they produced the Electoral College. For more than two centuries it has actually motivated union structure, used a voice to both small and huge states, and discouraged voter scams.
Regrettably, there is now a well-financed, below-the-radar effort to do away with the Electoral College. It is called National Popular Vote or NPV, and it wishes to do precisely what the Founders declined: award the job of President to the person who gets among the most votes nationally.
Even if you agree with this objective, it’s tough to accept their method. Instead of change the Constitution, which they have no chance of doing, NPV plans an end run around it.
Here’s what NPV does: it asks states to sign a contract to offer their governmental electors to the winner of the nationwide popular vote rather of the winner of the state’s popular vote.
What does that mean in practice? It suggests that if NPV had actually remained in location in 2004, for instance, when George W. Bush won the across the country vote, California’s electoral votes would have gone to Bush, although John Kerry won that state by 1.2 million votes!
Can you picture highly Democratic California calmly awarding its electors to a Republican?
A necessary benefit of the Electoral College system is that it decentralizes control over the election. Presently, a governmental election is truly 51 various elections: one in each state and one in D.C
.
California’s election code uses simply to California and identifies that state’s electors. A vote cast in Texas can never ever alter the identity of a California elector.
A vote cast in Texas will always affect the result in California. And the presence of a different election code in Texas constantly has the potential to unjustly affect a citizen in California.
Why?
Due to the truth that state election codes can vary considerably. States have various guidelines about early ballot, registering to vote, and getting authorized for the ballot. They have different policies concerning felon ballot. They have various triggers for states.
Each and every one of these differences is a chance for someone, someplace to file a suit claiming unfair treatment.
Why should a citizen in New York get generally time to early vote than a citizen in Florida? Why should a hanging chad count in Florida, but not in Ohio? The list of possible complaints is limitless.
For the total script, see https://www.prageru.com/videos/popular-vote-vs-electoral-college.
source
It’s called the National Popular Vote, and it would turn our governmental elections into a majority-rule affair. Our Founders so deeply feared a tyranny of the bulk that they declined the idea of a direct choose President. Hence, a vote cast in Texas will constantly affect the result in California. States have various guidelines about early voting, registering to vote, and licensing for the tally. Why should a voter in New York get basically time to early vote than a citizen in Florida?
States have various guidelines about early tally, registering to vote, and getting authorized for the ballot. Why should a citizen in New York get generally time to early vote than a voter in Florida? It’s called the National Popular Vote, and it would turn our governmental elections into a majority-rule affair. A vote cast in Texas will constantly impact the outcome in California. Why should a citizen in New York get more or less time to early vote than a citizen in Florida?
