What Is Intelligent Design?– Science and God

Chances are if you’ve heard anything about smart design, you’ve heard that it’s faith-based, not science-based. Is that real? Or does modern science, in truth, point us in the direction of a designing intelligence?

PragerU is experiencing severe censorship on Big Tech platforms. Go to https://www.prageru.com/ to view our videos free from censorship!

SUBSCRIBE https://www.prageru.com/join/

Take PragerU videos with you all over you go. Download our free mobile app!
Download for Apple iOS ➡ https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/prageru/id1115115779
Download for Android ➡ https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.cappital.prageru

To see the FACTS & SOURCES and Transcript, check out: https://www.prageru.com/video/what-is-intelligent-design-science-and-god

Join PragerU’s text list! https://optin.mobiniti.com/prageru

SHOP! Love PragerU? Visit our store today! https://shop.prageru.com/

Script:

Chances are if you’ve heard anything about intelligent design, you’ve heard that it’s a “faith-based,” not a “science-based” idea. Or maybe you’ve even heard it’s “religious beliefs masquerading as science.”.

Is that real?

Well, why don’t you choose?

According to evolutionary biologists such as Richard Dawkins of Oxford University, living systems “give the look of having been created for a function.” That look is simply an illusion.

Why?.

Well, according to Dawkins and his followers, undirected processes such as natural selection and random mutations can produce the complex design-like structures in living systems. In their view, natural selection can simulate the powers of a designing intelligence without being assisted or directed in any method..

In contrast, the advocates of smart style argue there are tell-tale features of living systems and deep space that are best described by a designing intelligence.

So what tell-tale indications of intelligence are we discussing?

There are many. Let’s focus here on simply one– the digital code kept in the DNA particle.

In 1953 James Watson and Francis Crick mapped out the structure of the DNA particle. Along the interior of their famed double helix, they found a four-character code at work..

They quickly understood that sequences of exactly located chemicals called “nucleotide bases” store and transfer the assembly guidelines– the information– for building the vital protein particles that cells require to make it through. No protein molecules, no life..

Crick later on proposed that the chemical constituents in DNA function like letters in a composed language or digital symbols in a computer system code..

Just as a well-functioning computer system code depends upon precise sequences of ones and absolutely nos, so too does the function of the DNA molecule rely on the particular plan of chemical bases along the spinal column of the double helix..

Famous biotech specialist Leroy Hood describes the info saved in DNA as “digital code.” Even Richard Dawkins has acknowledged, “the device code of the genes is uncannily computer-like.”.

Where did this information, this digital code, come from? Today this question lies at the heart of a terrific clinical secret: the secret of the origin of life..

Constructing a living cell requires numerous proteins. And structure proteins needs hereditary information in DNA or some other equivalent molecule.

Yet to date no theory of undirected chemical development can explain the origin of the digital info needed to develop the very first living cell from simpler non-living chemicals– simply put, the problem of getting life from non-life.

There is simply too much details in the cell to be discussed by opportunity alone. The likelihood of generating an area of DNA code capable of constructing just one practical protein by chance is vanishingly small, even taking into account the multi-billion-year history of the universe.

Therefore, the “given enough time anything is possible” argument no longer works. Origin of life scientists agree: the chance hypothesis has actually stopped working.

Chemistry does not help us, either. Unlike standard chemical compounds, like a crystal of salt, the chemical letters in the DNA message do not arrange themselves as a result of shared tourist attraction.

Due to the fact that of the method that ink sticks to paper, saying otherwise would be like saying that the message in a newspaper heading might spontaneously emerge. Plainly “something else” is at work. In this case, a paper editor.

For the total script along with FACTS & SOURCES, see https://www.prageru.com/video/what-is-intelligent-design-science-and-god.

source

Chances are if you’ve heard anything about intelligent style, you’ve heard that it’s faith-based, not science-based. Or does modern-day science, in fact, point us in the direction of a designing intelligence?

There is merely too much information in the cell to be described by chance alone. The likelihood of creating an area of DNA code capable of developing just one functional protein by opportunity is vanishingly little, even taking into account the multi-billion-year history of the universe. And even the easiest living cells require hundreds of proteins.