What Should We Do About Guns?|5 Minute Video
Would stricter weapon laws minimize weapon violence? Could gun control steps in locations like Australia operate in America? Nicholas Johnson, teacher of Law at Fordham University, explains.
Donate today to PragerU! http://l.prageru.com/2ylo1Yt
Signing up with PragerU is totally free! Sign up now to get all our videos as quickly as they’re launched. http://prageru.com/signup
Download Pragerpedia on your iPhone or Android! Thousands of sources and facts at your fingertips.
iPhone: http://l.prageru.com/2dlsnbG
Android: http://l.prageru.com/2dlsS5e
Join Prager United to get new swag every quarter, exclusive early access to our videos, and an annual TownHall phone call with Dennis Prager! http://l.prageru.com/2c9n6ys
Join PragerU’s text list to have these videos, totally free product free gifts and breaking announcements sent out directly to your phone! https://optin.mobiniti.com/prageru
Do you go shopping on Amazon? Click https://smile.amazon.com and a percentage of every Amazon purchase will be donated to PragerU. Same great items. Exact same low rate. Shopping made significant.
CHECK OUT PragerU! https://www.prageru.com
FOLLOW us!
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/prageru
Twitter: https://twitter.com/prageru
Instagram: https://instagram.com/prageru/
PragerU is on Snapchat!
SIGN UP WITH PragerFORCE!
For Students: http://l.prageru.com/29SgPaX
JOIN our Educators Network! http://l.prageru.com/2c8vsff
Script:
The next time you hear a political leader call for “sound judgment gun control,” listen for the information.
You are likely to be dealt with to a gush of platitudes about attack weapons, gun program sales and other half-measures.
These sorts of proposals are rooted in a theory of gun control that has been around because the 1960s. The fundamental idea is that fewer weapons equal less gun crime.
However for this theory to have even a chance of working, extreme decreases in the supply of weapons will be necessary. Everything else total up to security theatre.
The late Senator Howard Metzenbaum, a strong weapon control advocate, discussed it by doing this: “If you do not prohibit all guns you might as well prohibit none.”
Couple of, if any, politicians who call for “typical sense gun control” have the courage to propose this.
Even putting aside the issue of the Second Amendment to the Constitution, which affirms the right to keep and bear arms, a gun ban has no broad popular support. Never mind the conservative states, pistol ban referendums stopped working in 2 of our most liberal states – Massachusetts in 1976 and California in 1982– by big margins. No serious efforts have actually been made ever since.
Just recently Australia’s weapon control efforts have gained brand-new prominence as a possible model for the United States to follow.
Let’s take a closer take a look at Australia.
In 1996, after a lunatic utilized a semiautomatic rifle to murder 34 individuals in Tasmania, the Australian government banned all semi-automatic rifles and repeating shotguns.
Owners of roughly 700,000 signed up firearms– about a quarter of the nation’s 3 million overall weapons– were required to turn them in for destruction. The government called this a “buyback,” however in fact no one had an option.
As my research study reveals, this model will not operate in the United States for the basic reason that the United States has approximately 325 million guns. This is orders of magnitude more than any other country. Even if the Australian plan were attempted in the United States and worked to excellence, we ‘d still be left with over 200 million weapons, consisting of pistols which represent nearly 80 percent of weapon criminal offense.
To see the total script, visit https://www.prageru.com/videos/what-should-we-do-about-guns
source
Would stricter weapon laws minimize weapon violence? Could gun control steps in locations like Australia work in America? Even putting aside the concern of the Second Amendment to the Constitution, which verifies the right to keep and bear arms, a weapon ban has no broad popular support. As my research shows, this design will not work in the United States for the simple factor that the US has approximately 325 million guns. Even if the Australian plan were tried in the US and worked to excellence, we ‘d still be left with over 200 million guns, consisting of handguns which account for nearly 80 percent of gun criminal activity.
