Why Is Classical Art So Good?
What makes fantastic art great? Is it just a matter of personal taste, with little or no regard for ability or execution? Or are there standards by which a creative work can be objectively judged? Prominent artist Robert Florczak confronts these difficult questions.
SUBSCRIBE https://www.prageru.com/join
#classicalart #art #prageru
Script:
How do we understand that classical art– as opposed to modern art– is so good?
Because it was produced within the requiring requirements and improved concepts of aesthetics– the centuries-old branch of philosophy that measures creative quality, we understand it.
Painting, drawing, and sculpture use a number of characteristics such as composition, form, color, texture, movement and line to develop appeal.
To the experienced eye– and even to the casual viewer– each of these exists in any artwork worthwhile of being called “art.”.
Structure, for example, is the positioning of things– elegant and managed in the hands of a master, or haphazard and awkward in the hands of the inept. Color can be harmonious and exceptionally balanced, or garishly random and unpleasant. Movement can be uplifting and dynamic, or static and perverse.
In my previous PragerU video, “Why is Modern Art So Bad?”, I chronicled how art started to decline, starting from about the 1860s, when visual requirements were slowly abandoned.
Regrettably for the arts, not everybody agrees. I’m sure you’ve heard the arguments:.
” Art is simply a reflection of its time.”.
” Art isn’t about technical efficiency; it’s about making you believe.”.
” Art is a matter of individual taste. There’s no such thing as excellent art or bad art.”.
Where do these assumptions originate from? For the a lot of part, they are the result of art histories composed and taught over the last century not by artists, but by those in the humanities and social sciences. Not having an artist’s viewpoint or experience, let alone artistic talent, these teachers and authors have actually therefore framed art in the only language they comprehend: “significance and social significance.”.
It is no surprise then that people have come away with the concept that art is “merely a reflection of its time.” It can be, but not necessarily. In fact, the terrific artists of the past didn’t care one whit about “showing their times,” they cared primarily about producing art that looked great.
Art, by meaning, is a visual medium. There can be suggesting in other innovative mediums like literature and music, however the visual is what distinctively distinguishes art. When a visual medium becomes more about what it “suggests” and less about its pure visual experience, it may prosper as, say, journalism, or social commentary, however it has actually stopped working as art.
What do we look for to figure out quality in art? In a fantastic oil painting by the 17th century Dutch Master, Vermeer, the quality is there in the controlled balance of its composition, the harmony of its color, the skillful hand-eye coordination of its brushwork.
And not, by the method, due to the fact that it looks “practical,” or photographic, if you will. Great art need not even look reasonable to be great. It’s no wonder that many individuals believe the misconception that photography put an end to classical art, offered that they assume that looking “photographic” was the purpose of a painting.
For the full script, check out: https://www.prageru.com/video/why-is-classical-art-so-good.
source
What makes excellent art terrific? The great artists of the past didn’t care one whit about “showing their times,” they cared mostly about producing art that looked good.
What do we look for to determine quality in art? Fantastic art need not even look practical to be terrific. It’s no marvel that numerous people think the myth that photography put an end to classical art, given that they presume that looking “photographic” was the purpose of a painting.
