PragerU v. YouTube|5 Minute Video
Free speech is in jeopardy. Huge Tech behemoths like YouTube, Facebook and Twitter are putting their thumbs on the complimentary speech scale, “restricting” conservative content they do not like. PragerU is withstanding with a match against YouTube and its moms and dad company, Google. The authentic winner (or loser) will be the American public. In this video, Attorney Eric George, who is representing PragerU, sets out our case. Be the jury.
Contribute today to PragerU! http://l.prageru.com/2eB2p0h
To see the script, sources, test, and research study guides, visit https://www.prageru.com/video/prageru-v-youtube
GO TO PragerU! https://www.prageru.com
STORE!
Love PragerU? Now you can use PragerU product!
Join Prager United to get brand-new swag every quarter! http://l.prageru.com/2c9n6ys
Sign up with PragerU’s text list to have these videos, complimentary merchandise giveaways and breaking statements sent directly to your phone! https://optin.mobiniti.com/prageru
Do you shop on Amazon? Click https://smile.amazon.com and a percentage of every Amazon purchase will be contributed to PragerU.
FOLLOW us!
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/prageru
Twitter: https://twitter.com/prageru
Instagram: https://instagram.com/prageru/
PragerU is on Snapchat!
SIGN UP WITH PragerFORCE!
For Students: http://l.prageru.com/2aozfkP
JOIN our Educators Network! http://l.prageru.com/2aoz2y9
Script:
The most vital fit in America right now– and maybe the complimentary world– is Prager University v. YouTube.
You may consider this a grandiose declaration, particularly given that I’m the lead lawyer for PragerU. I ensure you, it’s not.
That’s because this case has to do with the most basic liberty Americans have: liberty of speech, as articulated in the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.
All our flexibilities– the truly concept of flexibility– springs from this. Lose it, and we’re no longer totally complimentary– not as individuals, and not as a country.
I’m not happy to accept that. PragerU does not accept that. And you should not, either.
Okay, so how did we participate in this scenario? A little background.
PragerU is what is called a 501( c)( 3 )– a non-profit educational media company. In 2016, viewers began to observe that particular PragerU videos were no longer offered.
YouTube specified no– each “restricted” video had actually been examined by a walking, talking human. YouTube considered each one unsuitable for youths, treating these videos the extremely same as they would, say, for ones containing pornography or severe violence. Keep in mind, this is PragerU we’re discussing– as Main Street as you can get!
Which, eventually, turns out to be the issue.
PragerU’s center-right content– a lot of their videos, by the way, have no political theme at all– angers YouTube’s perceptiveness. Simply put, the videos aren’t being limited to protect young people from inappropriate material; they’re being limited to safeguard young people from ideas YouTube disagrees with.
When YouTube would not take the “upseting” videos off their restricted list– there are now 100 on that list– we had no other option. YouTube was infringing on our right to complimentary speech.
Wait a second, you may state– YouTube, which is owned by Google, is a personal service. Can’t they do anything they desire?
The reaction is: Yes … and no.
Yes, if they are a publisher. No, if they are a public online forum.
What’s the distinction? This gets right to the nub of the matter.
For the complete script, see https://www.prageru.com/video/prageru-v-youtube
source
PragerU is combating back with a suit versus YouTube and its parent business, Google. In this video, Attorney Eric George, who is representing PragerU, lays out our case. PragerU is what is called a 501( c)( 3 )– a non-profit educational media service. In 2016, audiences started to observe that specific PragerU videos were no longer offered. Keep in mind, this is PragerU we’re discussing– as Main Street as you can get!
PragerU is withstanding with a fit versus YouTube and its parent business, Google. In this video, Attorney Eric George, who is representing PragerU, sets out our case. In 2016, audiences started to observe that particular PragerU videos were no longer available. PragerU is combating back with a match versus YouTube and its moms and dad business, Google. In this video, Attorney Eric George, who is representing PragerU, lays out our case.
