The Constitution: Why A Republic?
Winning the War of Independence brought a brand-new problem to the American individuals: what sort of federal government should they select for their brand-new nation? Robert George, Professor of Jurisprudence at Princeton University, explores the issues the creators dealt with at this pivotal moment in history.
#constitution #prageru #history
SUBSCRIBE https://www.prageru.com/join/
Take PragerU videos with you all over you go. Download our totally free mobile app!
Download for Apple iOS ➡ https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/prage …
Download for Android ➡ https://play.google.com/store/apps/de …
Script:
Versus all opportunities, the Americans won their War of Independence.
Their success brought a brand-new problem– no less challenging. What sort of government should they select on their own?
How could they guarantee that the tyranny of the English king George III would not be replaced by a homegrown tyranny?
One possibility was to develop an American monarchy with a much better king. That was appealing for some, especially due to the truth that they had an extraordinary person for the task– General George Washington.
To his legion of admirers, the truth that he did not want to be king made him a lot more enticing candidate.
The other possibility was to establish a republic, a federal government of and by the people and their agents.
This choice came with a huge problem. Historically, republics like those in ancient Greece and Rome had always quit working. And, when they failed, they were generally replaced by the really worst– most oppressive– kinds of tyranny.
Might there be a method to make republicanism work– and last? To structure a constitution that would secure the brand-new American republic from the social and political pathologies that had damaged republics throughout history?
America’s Founding Fathers– guys like Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin, John Adams, Alexander Hamilton, and James Madison– believed they had answers.
They had risked of everything when they stated their self-reliance from England; they wished to run the risk of whatever once again to develop a new, different, and much better sort of republic.
The secret, they all concurred, was to establish structural limits on power– the power of anyone, and any organization, working out governmental authority.
In the summertime of 1787, in amongst the most innovative acts in human history, these men (minus Jefferson and Adams who were serving the nation abroad) made an across the country federal government divided into 3 different parts or branches– the legal (Congress), the executive (the president), and the judicial (the courts). Congress would make laws, the executive would carry out the laws and the courts would settle differences developing under the Constitution and laws of the United States.
Dividing power would avoid power being focused in any one branch– the idea of balances and checks. In addition, the central federal government would be limited to the powers particularly handed over to it, having no powers beyond those specified.
Where then would the majority of the powers of federal government live? The reaction was with the states.
This was not, as some wrongly anticipate, done to secure slavery. Rather, it was done out of the commonsense belief that those public authorities nearer to individuals would naturally be more responsive and responsible to individuals.
Just to ensure nobody missed out on the point, after linking a Bill of Rights to the Constitution, the Founders enshrined this idea in the Tenth Amendment.
” The powers not entrusted to the United States by the Constitution, nor limited by it to the states, are scheduled to the States respectively, or to individuals.”
In short, whatever the Constitution does not specifically hand over to the across the country government comes from the states and individuals.
The power of the states was also limited by constitutional restrictions in specific areas, either considering that power in those locations had actually been delegated particularly to the nationwide federal government– such as the power to participate in treaties with other countries– or since the Framers did not want federal government at any level to have particular powers– such as the power to offer titles of nobility, something incompatible with republicanism.
For the full script, go to: https://www.prageru.com/video/the-constitution-why-a-republic
source
Winning the War of Independence brought a new obstacle to the American individuals: what sort of federal government should they choose for their new nation? Robert George, Professor of Jurisprudence at Princeton University, checks out the concerns the creators faced at this pivotal minute in history.
This service came with a big concern. Historically, republics like those in ancient Greece and Rome had actually constantly stopped working. And, when they quit working, they were generally changed by the extremely worst– most overbearing– kinds of tyranny.
Winning the War of Independence brought a brand-new trouble to the American people: what sort of federal government should they select for their new nation? Robert George, Professor of Jurisprudence at Princeton University, explores the issues the founders dealt with at this essential minute in history.
Historically, republics like those in ancient Greece and Rome had always stopped working. Historically, republics like those in ancient Greece and Rome had in fact constantly stopped working. And, when they stopped working, they were usually replaced by the exceptionally worst– most self-important– types of tyranny.
