How to Steal an Election: Mail-In Ballots
What’s the distinction between absentee balloting and universal mail-in balloting? The latter might seem like a terrific idea, however is it truly? Eric Eggers of the Government Accountability Institute addresses this critically important concern.
FOLLOW us!
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/prageru.
Twitter: https://twitter.com/prageru.
Instagram: https://instagram.com/prageru/.
SUBSCRIBE so you never miss out on a new video! https://www.prageru.com/join/.
To view the script, sources, test, go to https://www.prageru.com/video/how-to-steal-an-election-mail-in-ballots.
Join PragerU’s text list to have these videos, totally free product free gifts and breaking statements sent straight to your phone! https://optin.mobiniti.com/prageru.
Do you shop on Amazon? Click https://smile.amazon.com and a portion of every Amazon purchase will be contributed to PragerU. Very same great products. Exact same low rate. Shopping made meaningful.
STORE!
Love PragerU? Now you can use PragerU merchandise!
SIGN UP WITH PragerFORCE!
For Students: http://l.prageru.com/2aozfkP.
JOIN our Educators Network! http://l.prageru.com/2aoz2y9.
Script:.
Is there a problem with universal mail-in balloting?.
Sounds easy enough: You submit a ballot, stick it in the mail; someone counts it on Election Day. We already do that with absentee ballots? So why would universal mail-in balloting be any various?.
Well, the most significant distinction is that with absentee tallies, the citizen particularly asks for a tally..
With universal mail-in balloting, tallies are mailed out en masse. Millions of people who would generally go to the polls vote by mail instead.
No national election has ever been conducted by doing this. And there are very good factors to be concerned that one ever should..
Factor # 1:.
Governmental incompetence..
I do not think I need to sell you on the idea that when the federal government bureaucracy takes on a big brand-new project with little preparation, the outcomes aren’t quite. We’ve seen those results as it connects to mail-in balloting currently..
Wisconsin was among the first states to hold a primary in the coronavirus age. It saw an influx in mail-in votes as an outcome. Naturally, this led to severe snafus: Thousands of requested tallies were not sent; 1,600 tallies were discovered in a mail processing center the day after the election; 23,000 votes were turned down due to missing signatures or other missing info..
And those are the errors we understand about in just one state and in one main election, when fewer people than in the basic election usually bother to cast a vote.
In Pennsylvania, where they postponed the date of their main to improve prepared for the expected boost in mail-in balloting, they still couldn’t deal with the volume. Half of Philadelphia’s votes were still uncounted a week after the election.
In Virginia, majority a million applications for ballots were mailed with incorrect info. A few of the applications went to the incorrect addresses, some went to dead voters, one even went to a pet..
Under the best of situations, the administration has problem with mail-in balloting. Under less than the very best of scenarios? That’s not a circumstance we want to face..
Which brings us to factor # 2 for issue: substandard security.
Here’s what the New York Times said about voting by mail in a short article in 2012. Bear in mind, they were discussing conventional absentee balloting, not a mass-mailing of tallies.
” There is a bipartisan consensus that ballot by mail, whatever its impact, is more quickly mistreated than other forms.”.
No joking..
In May 2020, New Jersey conducted its first ever all-mail election. One month later, 2 chosen officials were amongst four charged with criminal conduct including mail-in tallies. One personnel admitted to taking tallies, both finished and uncompleted, out of mail boxes. Other operatives compiled a database of signatures of potential voters, and after that used them to complete tallies on behalf of their preferred candidates.
Since they got caught, and we only understand about it.
Election scams just figures to get easier due to the fact that of a new weapon in the cheater’s arsenal– tally harvesting. This is the term for when a third party– normally a project worker or activist– goes to people’s homes and collects their tallies..
With tally harvesting, you do not even have to put your tally in the mailbox; vote harvesters will choose it up for you. The opportunities for mischief– state, pushing individuals to vote a specific method, ruining tallies, or completing tallies for those who didn’t bother to vote– are endless..
Vote harvesting that targets elderly people for their ballots even has its own name: “granny farming.”.
Factor # 3 to be worried:.
The possibility of long hold-ups in determining results.
For the complete script check out https://www.prageru.com/video/how-to-steal-an-election-mail-in-ballots.
source
Sounds simple enough: You fill out a tally, stick it in the mail; someone counts it on Election Day. We already do that with absentee tallies? One month later on, two chosen authorities were among 4 charged with criminal conduct including mail-in ballots. One personnel confessed to taking tallies, both completed and uncompleted, out of mail boxes. Other operatives assembled a database of signatures of potential citizens, and then used them to fill out ballots on behalf of their chosen prospects.
