There Is Only One Way Out of Poverty|5 Minute Video
What’s the best way to help individuals stuck in hardship leave hardship? Arthur Brooks, president of the American Enterprise Institute, shows where conservatives and progressives vary.
Donate today to PragerU! http://l.prageru.com/2ylo1Yt
Read Arthur’s book! http://l.prageru.com/2mORSoN
Have you taken the pledge for school option? Click on this link! https://www.schoolchoicenow.com
Signing up with PragerU is free! Sign up now to get all our videos as quickly as they’re launched. http://prageru.com/signup
Download Pragerpedia on your iPhone or Android! Countless sources and realities at your fingertips.
iPhone: http://l.prageru.com/2dlsnbG
Android: http://l.prageru.com/2dlsS5e
Sign Up With Prager United to get brand-new swag every quarter, exclusive early access to our videos, and an annual TownHall phone call with Dennis Prager! http://l.prageru.com/2c9n6ys
Join PragerU’s text list to have these videos, free merchandise free gifts and breaking announcements sent out straight to your phone! https://optin.mobiniti.com/prageru
Do you shop on Amazon? Click https://smile.amazon.com and a portion of every Amazon purchase will be contributed to PragerU. Exact same great items. Very same low price. Shopping made meaningful.
GO TO PragerU! https://www.prageru.com
FOLLOW us!
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/prageru
Twitter: https://twitter.com/prageru
Instagram: https://instagram.com/prageru/
PragerU is on Snapchat!
SIGN UP WITH PragerFORCE!
For Students: http://l.prageru.com/29SgPaX
JOIN our Educators Network! http://l.prageru.com/2c8vsff
Script:
What’s the very best way to help poor people get away poverty?
Progressives and conservatives have extremely various responses to this question, but before we check out those answers, let’s agree on this:
Both conservatives and progressives believe that the federal government has a moral responsibility to assist those who, through misfortune or regrettable circumstances, can’t assist themselves.
Here’s what a conservative icon, Nobel Prize-winning economic expert, Frederic Hayek, stated on the subject:
” There is no reason, in a society that has reached the general level of wealth ours has actually achieved, the first sort of security must not be guaranteed to all … some minimum of shelter, clothing, and food adequate to protect health and the capacity to work.”
Whatever the media might tell you, there isn’t a conservative out there who would not concur with Hayek’s declaration.
As I have recorded in my book, Who Really Cares, when it comes to philanthropy and charitable giving, conservatives in fact out-give progressives– by a lot.
Where the two sides disagree is on the function the federal government plays– not in safeguarding the bad from hardship, but in lifting them out of it.
Here’s a disturbing piece of information: On balance, since President Lyndon Johnson’s War on Poverty programs came fully online in 1966, the poverty rate in America has actually hardly budged.
That rate, as calculated by the United States government, was 14.7 percent in 1966.
And today?
It’s 13.5 percent.
The rate has actually changed a few points up and down over the years. The net result is just one portion point of progress. And this seeks the federal government has actually invested over 20 trillion dollars on poverty relief programs.
20 trillion dollars– the existing size of the US financial obligation– and the needle has barely moved.
Now, it’s real that the official poverty rate doesn’t determine usage. Bad people today have many more things than poor individuals did in 1970.
Across all earnings levels, including the poor, Americans are most likely to have mobile phone, air conditioning system, flat screen TVs, computer systems and a vehicle. And life expectancy has extended considerably thanks to total enhancements in health care.
It demeans bad people to state that this product development makes hardship less of an issue. Our goal needs to never be to simply make hardship less unpleasant for individuals. Our goal must be to make hardship more escapable.
Numerous progressives use an uncomplicated solution: more financing for hardship programs. They think that we need to transfer more wealth– through government taxation– from people who have money to individuals who do not. This is the earnings inequality argument.
For the complete script, check out https://www.prageru.com/videos/there-only-one-way-out-poverty
source
What’s the best way to help individuals stuck in hardship get out of poverty? And this is after the federal government has actually invested over 20 trillion dollars on hardship relief programs.
It demeans bad people to say that this product development makes hardship less of a problem. Our goal ought to never ever be to merely make poverty less miserable for people. Lots of progressives use an uncomplicated solution: more funding for poverty programs.