Are Israeli Settlements the Barrier to Peace?|5 Minute Video
Is Israel’s policy of structure civilian communities in the West Bank the factor there’s no peace agreement with the Palestinians? Or would there still be no peace even if Israel removed all of its settlements and evicted Israeli settlers, as it did in Gaza in 2005?
PragerU is experiencing severe censorship on Big Tech platforms. Go to https://www.prageru.com/ to see our videos free from censorship!
SUBSCRIBE https://www.prageru.com/join/
Take PragerU videos with you everywhere you go. Download our totally free mobile app!
Download for Apple iOS ➡ https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/prage …
Download for Android ➡ https://play.google.com/store/apps/de …
Join PragerU’s text list! https://optin.mobiniti.com/prageru
SHOP! Love PragerU? Visit our store today! https://shop.prageru.com/
Script:
Is Israel’s policy of structure civilian neighborhoods in the area referred to as the West Bank the reason there is no permanent peace in between Israel and the Palestinians?
The answer to that concern, despite all the noise and fury regarding the so-called settlement concern, is no.
The Israeli settlements in the West Bank are not the major barrier to a peace agreement.
A little historical context will make this clear.
For twenty years before June of 1967, the West Bank, including much of Jerusalem, was controlled by Jordan. When Israel did not have a single settlement– there were many Palestinian terror attacks against the nation state of the Jewish people, during that time– a time. Simply put, Palestinians committed horror attacks against Israel when there were no settlements and they dedicated horror attacks against Israel when there were settlements.
It’s not likely that anything much would change if Israel were to pull out of every single settlement in the West Bank tomorrow. If history is any indication, Israel could be even worse off.
In 2005, Israel deserted every single neighborhood, every home, every farm, every structure it had actually built in the Gaza Strip. They launched thousands of rockets and numerous other fear attacks versus the nation state of the Jewish people. Can you blame Israel for not wanting to risk a two-front rocket war?
Israel has no right to be in the West Bank at all, lots of state. Permit me, a law professor at Harvard, to state that on the basis of worldwide law this position is incorrect.
Military professions are clearly allowed under global law following an aggressive attack by a neighboring state. Jordan, Israel’s next-door neighbor to the East, assaulted Israel in 1967, in spite of Israel’s repeated efforts to keep Jordan out of the Six Day War.
Considering that no peace treaty has been reached and the terrorism continues with brand-new attacks threatened practically daily, Israel is under no legal responsibility to leave. Provided the risk that Israel would be putting itself in if it did leave the West Bank– exposing its major cities and global airport to rocket attacks– it would be careless to do so, which is why Israel is still there.
I completely acknowledge that a military profession is substantially various, both as a matter of law and politics, from developing civilian settlements even in an area that is legitimately subject to a military profession. That’s why I have long opposed the structure of settlements in the West Bank. I believe it has triggered bitterness and has provided enemies of Israel a reason to attack the legitimacy of the profession in general.
For the total script, go to https://www.prageru.com/videos/are-israeli-settlements-barrier-peace
source
Is Israel’s policy of structure civilian neighborhoods in the West Bank the reason there’s no peace agreement with the Palestinians? Or would there still be no peace even if Israel eliminated all of its settlements and evicted Israeli inhabitants, as it did in Gaza in 2005? Throughout that time– a time when Israel did not have a single settlement– there were various Palestinian terror attacks against the nation state of the Jewish individuals. In other words, Palestinians devoted horror attacks against Israel when there were no settlements and they dedicated fear attacks against Israel when there were settlements.
Given the danger that Israel would be putting itself in if it did leave the West Bank– exposing its significant cities and global airport to rocket attacks– it would be reckless to do so, which is why Israel is still there.
