Can You Trust the NY Times?
The most popular news source in the world is the New York Times. Isn’t the Times the gold requirement of journalism?
PragerU is experiencing serious censorship on Big Tech platforms. Go to https://www.prageru.com/ to view our videos devoid of censorship!
SUBSCRIBE https://www.prageru.com/join/
Take PragerU videos with you all over you go. Download our complimentary mobile app!
Download for Apple iOS ➡ https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/prageru/id1115115779
Download for Android ➡ https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.cappital.prageru
To view the FACTS & & SOURCES and Transcript, go to: https://www.prageru.com/video/can-you-trust-the-ny-times
Register with PragerU’s text list! https://optin.mobiniti.com/prageru
Love PragerU? Visit our store today!
Script:
The most prominent news source in the world is the New York Times.
Every day, hundreds of documents, and television and cable television news stations around the globe follow its lead– actually.
Why would not they?.
Isn’t the Times the gold requirement of journalism? The location where the realities of the story exist without predisposition or program?
Truly, the response is no.
When it comes to episodes of considerable historic significance, the New York Times has regularly failed to offer the public with objective journalism. Rather, it has picked to make incorrect stories– usually with catastrophic repercussions.
It has in fact done this in service of its own financial and ideological interests.
This returns, a minimum of, to 1932.
That year there was an awful deficiency in the Ukraine. In between 5 and 7 million Ukranians starved to death. The disaster had nothing to do with bad climate condition and whatever to do with the ruthless routine of the Soviet totalitarian Joseph Stalin.
Walter Duranty, the Times foreign reporter in Moscow, comprehended all of this and covered it up. His reports flatly turned down there was any starvation at all.
The American media took its lead from the Times star press reporter. Did America’s political elite, including newly-elected President Franklin Roosevelt who personally satisfied with Duranty to review “the situation” in the Soviet Union.
Duranty had another admirer, Josef Stalin. The ruthless autocrat had definitely nothing but appreciation for the New York Times guy: “You have really done an excellent job in your reporting of the USSR … due to the reality that you attempt to tell the reality about our nation.”.
Had Duranty exposed the realities about Stalin and the scarcity, the American individuals would have much better comprehended the true nature of the Soviet Union. Instead, great deals of were tricked.
When it came to reporting on the persecution of Jews in Germany leading up to World War II, the Times was even worse. If the Times didn’t think the genocide of the Jews was a substantial story, it ought to not be one.
In 1957, the Times turned this script. It took a small story– a disobedience in Cuba– and turned it into a major one. While doing so, it helped mess up a whole country.
New york city Times reporter, Herbert Matthews, situated an all-but-defeated rebel called Fidel Castro at his mountain hideout.
From this interview came a flurry of front-page New York Times posts hailing Castro as Cuba’s democratic rescuer. The Times changed the down-and-out Marxist revolutionary into an around the world experience. It is not an exaggeration to say that the Times made Castro. Without its assistance, the Cuban revolution would have likely stopped working.
An exceptionally similar phenomenon played out a few years in the future in Southeast Asia. This time rather of making a hero out of a bad guy, the Times made a villain out of a hero.
With the paper’s true blessing, a bold, young Times reporter, David Halberstam, picked that South Vietnamese chose leader Ngo Dinh Diem was a homicidal madman. Recorded up in the controling leftist idea that the American war effort was dishonest, which the North Vietnamese communists were the genuine liberty fighters, Halberstam composed piece after piece established to minimize Diem. The one that did it was his reporting that the Diem government had actually massacred 30 Buddhist monks who were objecting Diem’s policies.
Just it didn’t occur. Halberstam produced it out of whole fabric, basing it on personal sources and reports.
When a United Nations group later analyzed the killings, they discovered that all the “killed” Buddhists were alive and well.
For the total records go to: https://www.prageru.com/video/can-you-trust-the-ny-times.
source
The most prominent news source on the planet is the New York Times. When it came to reporting on the persecution of Jews in Germany leading up to World War II, the Times was even worse. If the Times didn’t believe the genocide of the Jews was a considerable story, it needs to not be one.
From this interview came a flurry of front-page New York Times short posts hailing Castro as Cuba’s democratic hero. With the paper’s true blessing, a strong, young Times press reporter, David Halberstam, selected that South Vietnamese chose leader Ngo Dinh Diem was a homicidal madman.
From this interview came a flurry of front-page New York Times posts hailing Castro as Cuba’s democratic savior. With the paper’s true blessing, a bold, young Times reporter, David Halberstam, selected that South Vietnamese chose leader Ngo Dinh Diem was a murderous madman. The most influential news source in the world is the New York Times. When it came to reporting on the persecution of Jews in Germany leading up to World War II, the Times was even worse. If the Times didn’t believe the genocide of the Jews was a substantial story, it should not be one.
