Do 97% of Climate Scientists Really Agree?|5 Minute Video
Is it real that 97% of climate researchers agree that climate modification is genuine? Where does the 97% figure come from? And if it holds true, do they settle on both the severity of and the service to environment change? New York Times bestselling author Alex Epstein, founder of the Center for Industrial Progress, reveals the origins of the “97%” figure and describes how to think more clearly about climate change.
Contribute today to PragerU! http://l.prageru.com/2ylo1Yt
Signing up with PragerU is totally free! Sign up now to get all our videos as quickly as they’re launched. http://prageru.com/signup
Download Pragerpedia on your iPhone or Android! Countless sources and truths at your fingertips.
iPhone: http://l.prageru.com/2dlsnbG
Android: http://l.prageru.com/2dlsS5e
Join Prager United to get brand-new boodle every quarter, special early access to our videos, and a yearly TownHall call with Dennis Prager! http://l.prageru.com/2c9n6ys
Sign up with PragerU’s text list to have these videos, free merchandise free gifts and breaking statements sent straight to your phone! https://optin.mobiniti.com/prageru
Do you shop on Amazon? Click https://smile.amazon.com and a percentage of every Amazon purchase will be contributed to PragerU. Same excellent products. Same low cost. Shopping made meaningful.
SEE PragerU! https://www.prageru.com
FOLLOW us!
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/prageru
Twitter: https://twitter.com/prageru
Instagram: https://instagram.com/prageru/
PragerU is on Snapchat!
JOIN PragerFORCE!
For Students: http://l.prageru.com/29SgPaX
JOIN our Educators Network! http://l.prageru.com/2c8vsff
Script:
” 97 percent of climate scientists agree that climate change is real.”
The number of times have you heard that statement? Most likely hundreds. It may look like a engaging and clinical argument versus nonrenewable fuel sources, however it’s one of the most illogical, unscientific arguments you can make. To see how, let’s utilize this kind of argument for another controversial product, vaccines.
An anti-vaccine person techniques you and says, “97 percent of doctors say that the negative effects of vaccines are real?”
What would you say in action?
You ‘d probably state, “Yeah but the benefits far exceed the side effects.”
By stating that “97% of doctors concur that vaccine negative effects are genuine” without discussing any of the advantages of vaccines, the anti-vaccine activist is trying to get you to take a look at the possible dangers of vaccines out of context.
When fossil fuel opponents state “97 percent of environment researchers agree that environment change is genuine,” they are doing the same. Yes, using nonrenewable fuel sources for energy has a side effect– increasing the quantity of CO2 in the environment. Okay. However what about the advantage? In the case of fossil fuel that upside is enormous: the cheap, numerous, and reliable energy that makes modern life possible, and at a scale no other energy source can match.
How substantial is the side effect? This raises another problem with the statement “97% percent of climate scientists concur that environment modification is real.” It informs us absolutely nothing about the significance or magnitude of “climate modification”– whether it’s a moderate, manageable warming or a runaway, catastrophic warming. This is an example of the fallacy of equivocation– using the very same term in various, contradictory methods.
If someone were to state “97% of physicians agree that vaccine side results are real,” what exact “vaccine side effects” do the physicians agree on? Or that large portions will get full-blown autism?
But nonrenewable fuel source challengers don’t want you to know the accurate magnitude of climate change. Because if you did you would not be scared of environment modification, you would be scared of losing the advantages of fossil fuels.
“97 percent of climate scientists have actually verified that climate modification is happening and that human activity is accountable,” he said in a speech in Indonesia in 2014. 97 percent of environment researchers never ever stated any such thing.
For the complete script, check out https://www.prageru.com/video/do-97-of-climate-scientists-really-agree/
source
Do 97% of Climate Scientists Really Agree? Is it true that 97% of climate researchers concur that environment modification is genuine? New York Times bestselling author Alex Epstein, founder of the Center for Industrial Progress, reveals the origins of the “97%” figure and describes how to think more plainly about climate modification.
When fossil fuel challengers state “97 percent of climate scientists concur that climate modification is real,” they are doing the exact same. “97 percent of climate scientists have actually confirmed that environment change is happening and that human activity is accountable,” he said in a speech in Indonesia in 2014.
