The Intolerance of Tolerance
What does it mean to be tolerant? The dictionary defines tolerance as respect for opinions, beliefs, and practices that differ from your own. But in our polarized cultural climate, it has come to mean something else entirely. Greg Koukl, president of Stand to Reason and author of Tactics, sorts it all out.
Tactics by Greg Koukl: https://l.prageru.com/38TDDnl
To view the script, sources, quiz, visit https://www.prageru.com/video/the-intolerance-of-tolerance
Join PragerU’s text list to have these videos, free merchandise giveaways and breaking announcements sent directly to your phone! https://optin.mobiniti.com/prageru
Do you shop on Amazon? Click https://smile.amazon.com and a percentage of every Amazon purchase will be donated to PragerU. Same great products. Same low price. Shopping made meaningful.
FOLLOW us!
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/prageru
Twitter: https://twitter.com/prageru
Instagram: https://instagram.com/prageru/
SHOP!
Love PragerU? Now you can wear PragerU merchandise! Visit our store today! https://shop.prageru.com/
JOIN PragerFORCE!
For Students: http://l.prageru.com/2aozfkP
JOIN our Educators Network! http://l.prageru.com/2aoz2y9
Script:
Do you know what the word “tolerance” means? If you do, I salute you, because I have no idea anymore. I did… once. Everybody did… once. But now, thanks to the left, the word is totally up for grabs. Actually, it’s worse than that. Tolerance now means the opposite of what it once meant. Tolerance now means intolerance, and intolerance now means tolerance.
Confusing—yeah, I know—but stay with me. There’s a big pay-off at the end. It’s called “clarity.”
To be “tolerant” today simply means you agree with politically-correct—that is, left-wing—positions. That’s all it means.
This is easy to show: Name one position that differs from the left that they don’t label intolerant.
When you differ with the left on any subject—and I mean any—the people who claim to be tolerant don’t attack your position; they attack you. They label you, as Dennis Prager puts it, “SIXHIRB”—sexist, intolerant, xenophobic, homophobic, Islamophobic, racist, bigoted. And if that fails, there’s always the ever-popular “hater.”
This is obviously not tolerance. This is blatant intolerance. Your accusers are guilty of doing exactly the same thing they’re accusing you of doing.
Here’s what they’re missing: In order to be genuinely tolerant of someone, you first have to disagree with them, since you don’t tolerate people you agree with. The classic definition of “tolerance” means to recognize and respect others’ beliefs and practices without sharing them.
Notice the element of disagreement is key to tolerance. Without it, true tolerance is not possible. This is critical. We don’t “tolerate” people we agree with—we’re on the same side! We only “tolerate” people we differ with, yet still choose to treat decently and with respect.
This vital ingredient of real tolerance is completely missing in the politically correct version. Nowadays, if you differ with others on culturally sensitive issues—like sexual orientation or religious beliefs—you’re labeled intolerant no matter how you treat them.
The left says all behaviors and ideas have equal value—that no behavior or idea is any better than any other. They don’t act that way. Tolerance is a one-way street for the left.
Openly declare that sex differences are real, as Harry Potter novelist J. K. Rowling did, and see what happens. You’ll be called “transphobic” by the left. The same thing happened to legendary tennis star and feminist Martina Navratilova, when she said it was unfair to women to have to compete against trans-athletes—that is, athletes who say they identify as female, but are biologically male. But I thought, according to the left, all ideas have equal value. So why are J.K. Rowling and Martina Navratilova suddenly called haters? Because the left doesn’t believe its own rhetoric.
What the left has done is cleverly redefine tolerance to mean “agreement with leftist views.” Tolerance no longer means treating people with civility and respect even when we disagree with them. It means not disagreeing with them—that is, the left. That’s how, in the name of tolerance, the left shuts down all disagreement. It defines any contradiction of leftist views as intolerant.
But not only is disagreement not intolerant, it’s morally and logically essential. Think about it. All ideas, all behaviors are not equally valid. Some are better. Some are worse. And discussion and disagreement and debate are how we sort out the good from the bad. Civilization depends on it.
For the complete script, visit https://www.prageru.com/video/the-intolerance-of-tolerance
source








Nothing here about tolerance under the law. That might well be Anti-Fa talk. One needed to be careful waking sleepwalkers who think they run the show until we had no other choices. For example, those from unreconstructed feudal societies who didn't bother to bring their masters with them.
Tolerant people must tolerant my intolerance 🥱🥱🥱
I feel like conservatives and the right have a vague understanding of what tolerance is.
For example, just because you tolerate minorities, doesn't mean you have to tolerate the bigots that hate minorities for stupid reasons.
There is nothing wrong with being intolerant to cringe takes and assholes. Heck, I rarely see any left-leaning person claiming that we should. I feel like this is just rhetoric that the right just inserted on their own.
It's basic, really.
Please tell this to the Mormons and Catholics as well, you will see that even the Right shuts down all disagreement (such as Vaccines and Evolution) and is therefore, much more similar than different to the Left. Dougal Dixon made a huge mistake of inaccurately depicting the next sentient species on earth (Memory People) by coincidentally copy-pasting current Two-Party orthodoxy (eschewal of knowledge) for their behavior story, when in reality they would even remember so much about the Two-Party system eventually destroying their ancestors that they would choose Permanent Civil Rights over any religious refusal to use their knowledge to eventually fully protect our solar system for generations to come.
Liberals trying not to ruin every word they touch (impossible)
They don't teach English in school any more, they teach Doublethink.
The dislike the premise, of saying "left" to paint the intolerant group as a huge singular mass.
To the audience this video:
1.
This guy changes definitions, among many things, to fit his fascist agenda.
2.
Check out Karl Popper's Paradox of Intolerance. You need to be intolerant towards the intolerant to manifest a tolerant society. Ergo, be intolerant towards this guy to manifest a tolerant society.
PragerU is fascist, they don’t deserve attention.
The left have nothing to do with being hypocrite, you're wrong to assume it comes from the left
There is no intolerance like leftist tolerance.
Have any of y'all heard the paradox of tolerance? C'mon!!
It was 3 years ago..god so true, Ive seen those people and got that something's wrong, and formed this view aout one year ago y myself, well ima teenager so ima proud haha
great video!
Dennis Prager recommends treating nazis w civilty and respect. Got it.
I'm fascinated by conservative attempts to rebrand or redefine certain characters and words. I.E. "feminism means man-hating-dikes. tolerance means leftist ideology. Heck- Jesus was a gun toting capitalist that believed in closed borders! Durp!"
this man is speaking gospel, telling the truth. huge respect.
you are afraid and preach hate. luckily this mind set is dying with your old body.
ive taken dumps that had more to stay
4:15 The problem is when people identify so strongly with their ideas that they interpret unacceptance or refutations of those ideas the same as being intolerant to them as persons. This is what identity politics exploits, to turn people against each other on the basis of their differing ideas.