Understanding Marxism: The Enemy of Being is Having

Commercialism is the source of all evil. If we can simply eliminate the capitalist system, we can eliminate hardship, inequality, exploitation, class dispute, and war. This is what Karl Marx thought, and many today still follow his lead. Is his utopian vision possible? And would we desire it even if it were?

C. Bradley Thomspon is the author of “The Redneck Intellectual” on Substack, and America’s Revolutionary Mind: A Moral History of the American Revolution and the Declaration that Defined It.

#marxism #prageru #history #karlmarx

SUBSCRIBE https://www.prageru.com/join/

Take PragerU videos with you everywhere you go. Download our complimentary mobile app!
Download for Apple iOS ➡ https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/prage …
Download for Android ➡ https://play.google.com/store/apps/de …

Script:

Why does anyone still care about Marxism?

Karl Marx has actually been dead for well over a century.

All over Marxism has actually been attempted, it has really left death and damage in its wake. Definitely absolutely nothing in the last thousand years comes close to the quantity of mass, tyranny, and scary murder caused by Marxist programs.

Marxism lives.

It might emerge today as postmodernism, multiculturalism, feminism, environmentalism, or important race theory, however it’s still Marxism.

There ought to be fantastic reasons that it has really endured– even flourished– in the face of constant failure.

Say what you will about Marx the economist, he was a master psychologist. He recognized that there are many individuals in every society who, like himself, are encouraged by envy and bitterness.

Marx speaks straight to them. If we can just get rid of that, he guarantees, we can eliminate poverty, inequality, exploitation, class alienation, dispute, and war.

Not a bad list if you’re looking to start an improvement.

But there’s more: Marxism assures us that this socialist utopia is close at hand– offered to all, not in some long run, or in the next life, however here and now.

All we have to do is get rid of one little difficulty– human nature.

Marx revealed his inmost views on this topic in his Economic and philosophical Manuscripts of 1844. They can be summed up in one expression: The enemy of being is having.

Since it develops an unjustified world of inequality, class, and exploitation dispute, the most typical analysis of Marx’s approach suggests that he opposed industrialism. Marxism, according to this view, is everything about matching earnings and social status.

This is true, however it does not go far enough.

Marx saw the build-up of product wealth as dehumanizing.

The more money and product belongings one gets, the more separated one is from his genuine humanity.

And what was that?

In the thinker’s socialist paradise, one gets to take in, drink, and go to the theatre absolutely free of charge and without requiring to make money. Most importantly, you get to do it without the remorse of being a moocher.

All you require to do is enjoy yourself.

Yes, rear livestock at night. That’s how in touch Marx was with fact.

Who cleans up out the drains– does the “unclean tasks” that keep a society working? Paradoxically, in the wicked capitalist society, the drain cleaner easily chooses to take on this task. In the socialist “paradise” coercion is typically needed.

Marx never ever troubled with such unpleasant info. He left that to others. Sadly, those others continuously turn out to be megalomaniacs like Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Castro, Pol Pot and Hugo Chavez. They were the ones who brought Marx to life and while doing so triggered tens of millions to suffer and die.

Contrary to Marx’s claims, work easily picked brings both money and self-respect. Additionally, the majority of people work best when they pursue their own self-interest, a principle Marx hated.

To him, self-interest turns everybody into Ebenezer Scrooge: greedy, comprehending, and unfeeling. Not just is money– that is, capital– inherently corrupting, but the acquisition of it can’t be done truthfully or relatively. The abundant got abundant by using the employee. For Marx, there’s no other possible explanation.

For numerous today, there is no other possible explanation. For these people, Marx offers a philosophical validation for their anger– even their rage. From generation to generation the formula never ever differs: just by bringing the “privileged” down, can the “impoverished” be raised.

For the total script, go to: https://www.prageru.com/video/understanding-marxism-the-enemy-of-being-is-having?playlist=understanding-marxism-series.

source

Marx expressed his inmost views on this topic in his Philosophical and financial Manuscripts of 1844. Marx never ever bothered with such untidy information. They were the ones who brought Marx to life and at the same time triggered 10s of millions to die and suffer.

For Marx, there’s no other possible explanation.

For these people, Marx uses a philosophical reason for their anger– even their rage.

Marx never ever bothered with such unpleasant details. They were the ones who brought Marx to life and while doing so triggered 10s of millions to suffer and pass away.

For these individuals, Marx uses a philosophical validation for their anger– even their rage. Marx revealed his inmost views on this subject in his Economic and philosophical Manuscripts of 1844. They were the ones who brought Marx to life and in the procedure triggered 10s of millions to pass away and suffer.