iframe width=”580″ height=”385″ src=”https://www.youtube.com/embed/qV27AGomwFA?autoplay=1&modestbranding=1″ frameborder= “0” allowfullscreen > Private property, wage labor, competition, and profits– under Karl Marx’s world view, these would have to go. Rather of self-interest, everyone would work for the benefit of everybody else. For many, this is an extremely sexy idea.
C. Bradley Thomspon is the author of “The Redneck Intellectual” on Substack, and America’s Revolutionary Mind: A Moral History of the American Revolution and the Declaration that Defined It.
#marxism #prageru #history #karlmarx
SUBSCRIBE https://www.prageru.com/join/
Take PragerU videos with you all over you go. Download our totally free mobile app!
Download for Apple iOS ➡ https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/prage …
Download for Android ➡ https://play.google.com/store/apps/de …
Script:
In a remarkably brief time period, the approach of Karl Marx altered the course of history.
At the height of its power, half the world fell under its rule, kept there by a mix of worry, fear, and brute force.
Then all of a sudden in the late 1980’s, it imploded.
By all rights this should have been completion of Marxism. It hasn’t turned out that way.
From environmentalism with its rejection of free markets to Critical Race Theory which sees white patriarchy as the source of all evil, you’ll discover Marxism at its root. The leaders of Black Lives Matter, for instance, openly acknowledge their devotion to Marxist ideology.
How do we discuss this fascination for something that has so utterly stopped working all over it’s been implemented?
We can discover answers in one of Marx’s most enduring epigrams.
” From Each According to his Ability, to Each According to his Needs.”
Marx was a bad economic expert, however a talented journalist, the only real task he ever had. He understood how to turn an expression. What does this motto indicate? According to what capability? According to what require? And who determines anybody’s capability or anybody’s requirement?
Marx never bothered to address these apparent concerns. He had much bigger things on his mind: nothing less than the development of a completely new kind of world for a totally new type of human being.
Marx thought that by modifying male’s economic and political institutions, he might modify– and even much better– rewire the human brain; he might conjure a brand-new consciousness that would replace the old “false” one. This brand-new guy would be less selfish and acquisitive and more altruistic and common. Simply put, he would be an exceptional type of man.
Obviously, this brand-new male might just reach this objective if he wasn’t preoccupied with needing to earn money. According to Marx, money and the pursuit of it messed up whatever. Due to the fact that he never ever discovered a way to make it, Marx hated money– perhaps. Getting rid of it was central to his world view. Once an individual’s subsistence– one’s day-to-day bread– was dispersed on the basis of need rather than greed, man’s natural common affections– long reduced by his capitalist overlords– would be renewed.
This is Marx channeling the 18th century French social thinker Jean Jacques Rousseau, among the couple of individuals Marx admired. According to Rousseau, this is what you need to do if you want to develop a brand-new society.
” He who attempts to undertake the making of a people’s organizations should feel himself efficient in changing … humanity, of transforming each individual, who by himself is a singular and total whole, into a part of a bigger whole, from which … the private receives his life and his being …”.
Comprehend this and you comprehend not just an essential function of Marxist idea, but the dark history of the twentieth century.
Marx took Rousseau actually: humanity had to be returned to its allegedly pure, selfless state before capitalism, with its Enlightenment and Judeo-Christian values, “corrupted” him.
Producing this “brand-new guy” would be a formidable task. Marx anticipated that lots of would object, particularly the owners and supervisors that had a big stake in the capitalist system. Friendly persuasion wasn’t going to get the job done. Only the callous application of State power would be up to the job.
Marx recommended it.
Private property, wage labor, competition, and profits– these would have to go. The State, now run by the employees themselves– The Dictatorship of the Proletariat, as Marx called it– would manage production and rates. It would carefully manage the economy: from each according to his ability, to each according to his requirements.
And picture how fantastic it would be– no more ego, no more self-interest; rather, everyone working for the advantage of everybody else. Peace.
For the total script, go to: https://www.prageru.com/video/understanding-marxism-from-each-according-to-his-ability.
source
Private home, wage labor, competition, and revenues– under Karl Marx’s world view, these would have to go. Marx thought that by altering male’s financial and political organizations, he could change– or even better– rewire the human brain; he might conjure a brand-new consciousness that would replace the old “incorrect” one. According to Marx, money and the pursuit of it messed up whatever. Marx disliked cash– perhaps due to the fact that he never ever discovered a method to make it. The State, now run by the workers themselves– The Dictatorship of the Proletariat, as Marx called it– would control production and pricing.
