Confessions of an Environmentalist

Imagine you committed your life to environmentalism and all of its presumptions. Imagine you understand those assumptions are all wrong. What would you do? Business owner Brian Gitt informs his personal story and where it led him.

SUBSCRIBE https://www.prageru.com/join

#environment #environmental #prageru

Script:

Just because you feel like you’re doing the ideal thing doesn’t indicate you are. I have devoted the majority of my life to protecting the environment. I went about it the wrong method. I thought I was acting ethically, safeguarding the well-being of individuals and the planet. I was damaging both.

I thought solar and wind power were the future– our only hope of preventing ecological disaster. Fossil fuels were the enemy, drawn out from the earth by greedy business ransacking the land, contaminating the air, and ruining communities.

Keeping the wilderness as beautiful as possible was my enthusiasm.

Ever since I was a teen, I liked the outdoors. I led mountaineering explorations in Alaska, spent months backpacking in the Rockies, and climbed up the highest peaks in national forests. I only took tasks that I thought would safeguard the environment.

I began a company that built composting systems for services and cities.

I worked as executive director of an organization that championed green building policies.

And after that I ended up being CEO of a consulting firm that dealt with making homes more energy effective.

At that time, the Obama administration had earmarked billions of dollars in federal funding to develop tasks in the energy sector, and my business won multi-year contracts valued at over $60 million.

I believed I was making a real difference worldwide. I was surrounded by wise, successful, enthusiastic individuals who shared my beliefs and my sincere desire to alter things. And my company had great deals of money and lots of government assistance.

There was just one problem: our job to construct more energy-efficient homes was an utter failure.

Making home energy improvements was much too expensive for middle-class families– even with generous government aids. Wealthy households, by contrast, liked the program. They got aids they didn’t require and the ecological cred they yearned for. In truth, though, we weren’t attaining much of anything– other than wasting taxpayer money.

That’s not how the government saw it. The government commemorated the job as a big win.

It was a great media event for political leaders. However I knew the program didn’t provide the tasks and energy cost savings we had actually promised.

Maybe I must have accepted the props and kept doing what I was doing.

I could not.

I started re-examining everything I had believed about energy and the environment.

It didn’t take me long to recognize that I had been residing in a dream world: perfectly fine for making me feel good about myself and my objective, but perfectly useless for materializing ecological modification.

The more research I did, the more I recognized that my project was just a sign of a much larger problem.

We’re wasting trillions of dollars on the false hope that wind and solar power are going to replace nonrenewable fuel sources– oil, coal, and gas. Over the last 20 years, the world’s dependence on these fuels has actually decreased by just three percentage points– from 87% to 84%.

That’s a worthless return on our “investment.”.

If we’re severe about facing climate modification, protecting the environment, and assisting individuals climb up out of energy hardship around the globe, we require to stop chasing after fantasies. Instead, it’s time to truthfully analyze all the costs and all the benefits of every energy source– wind, solar, oil, coal, gas, and nuclear.

When discussing energy and the environment, greenhouse gas emissions are a concern however not the only thing we require to think about. Here are five principles to assist us evaluate the best energy options to protect both people and the planet.

One. Dependability: A dependable energy source provides power 24/7/365. States and countries that have actually doubled down on sustainable sources face energy rationing and power blackouts.

2. Price: The expense of energy impacts the cost of everything else. If energy isn’t budget-friendly, regular people can’t warm and cool their homes, and companies can’t make the products we need and desire.

For the complete script, check out: https://www.prageru.com/video/confessions-of-an-environmentalist.

source

Making home energy enhancements was much too pricey for middle-class families– even with generous federal government aids. Dependability: A trusted energy source provides power 24/7/365. States and countries that have actually doubled down on renewable sources deal with energy rationing and power blackouts.

Cost: The cost of energy affects the cost of whatever else. If energy isn’t budget friendly, normal individuals can’t heat up and cool their homes, and organizations can’t make the products we need and desire.