Conservatives Are the Real Environmentalists

Environmentalists are particular conservatives don’t care about clean air and clean water; that they’re happy to trade the world for earnings. Is it real? Do conservatives really care more about green pockets than green forests? Michael Knowles uses a much-needed brand-new point of view.

To view the script, sources, quiz, visit https://www.prageru.com/video/conservatives-are-the-real-environmentalists

Sign up with PragerU’s text list to have these videos, totally free merchandise free gifts and breaking statements sent directly to your phone! https://optin.mobiniti.com/prageru

Do you shop on Amazon? Click https://smile.amazon.com and a percentage of every Amazon purchase will be contributed to PragerU. Exact same terrific products. Same low rate. Shopping made significant.

FOLLOW us!
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/prageru
Twitter: https://twitter.com/prageru
Instagram: https://instagram.com/prageru/

STORE!
Love PragerU? Now you can use PragerU merchandise!

JOIN PragerFORCE!

For Students: http://l.prageru.com/2aozfkP
JOIN our Educators Network! http://l.prageru.com/2aoz2y9

Script:

I hate tidy air and water. I don’t care just how much companies contaminate streams and rivers. I do not even like trees. I simply care about tax cuts.

Who am I? Well, that’s easy: I’m a conservative. Or at least, I’m a progressive caricature of a conservative.
However the caricature is absurd on its face. Conservatives breathe the same air and drink the same water ecologists do. Conservatives love taking their kids to the very same national forests environmentalists do.

In fact, the whole concept of national parks was developed by a Republican, Ulysses Grant. The park system was significantly broadened by another Republican, Teddy Roosevelt. And the Environmental Protection Agency was, yes, developed by a Republican– Richard Nixon. He liked tidy air, too.

Conservatives want to conserve things. It’s right there in the name. And among the important things we wish to save is our environment, since you can’t have a healthy neighborhood without a healthy natural surroundings. That wasn’t even difficult for me to say. Since … I think it.

Conservatives enjoy the environment every bit as much as ecologists do. The concern is: What is the best method to safeguard it? And here’s where we have huge distinctions.

The ecologists say the very best method– the only method– is through enormous federal, and even international, guideline. Conservatives say the very best way to secure the environment is by safeguarding home rights and encouraging innovation. Much safer, more efficient power– nuclear, geothermal, biomass– anything that generates energy at a rate consumers desire and can afford to pay.

To the extent that federal government gets involved in conservation– say, protecting wildlife– it should get included at the most regional level possible, since the farmer, forester or fisherman in Oregon knows a lot more about his environment than some bureaucrat in Washington, D.C. or Brussels.

How can we inform which method works best?

Let’s examine the historical record. Today and for the last century, the worst ecological wrongdoers have been big, repressive, socialist governments. This was true in the last century, and it’s real now.

China, for instance, pumps approximately twice as much carbon into the air each year as the United States, despite the fact that the U.S. economy is almost 60% larger than China’s.

And how do those international contracts fare at securing the environment? Not too well, it ends up.

When President Trump announced his objective to pull the U.S. out of the Paris Climate Accord, ecologists cautioned of imminent catastrophe. A year later, it turned out that the United States led the world in lowering carbon emissions. It did so without surrendering its national sovereignty.

Moreover, Canada, the EU, and China– all signatories to the Paris Accords– not just stopped working to measure up to their dedications, however increased their yearly carbon emissions. The EU launched an extra 40 million lots of carbon dioxide into the air that year; China, a tremendous 120 million extra heaps– all while wagging their fingers at Uncle Sam.

Here’s what you will not hear from your area Greenpeace volunteer: The left prefers Big Government solutions not due to the fact that it’s much better for the environment, however due to the fact that it’s better for leftism.

Take a look at the Green New Deal, an environmental proposition welcomed by essentially every major progressive in America. Forget for a minute the impracticality of a plan that would disallow most forms of American energy and cost $93 trillion dollars. Much of the proposal has nothing to do with the environment: interacted socially medication, reparations for historical wrongs, and a jobs-guarantee program are simply a few of the products on its wish list.

For the total script, check out https://www.prageru.com/video/conservatives-are-the-real-environmentalists

source

Environmentalists are specific conservatives do not care about tidy air and clean water; that they’re happy to trade the planet for earnings. Conservatives breathe the same air and consume the exact same water environmentalists do. Conservatives love taking their kids to the exact same nationwide parks ecologists do.

Conservatives enjoy the environment every bit as much as environmentalists do. Conservatives say the finest way to protect the environment is by protecting property rights and encouraging development.