HR 1 Is An Invitation For Voter Fraud: Hans von Spakovsky on C-Span’s Washington Journal
Hans von Spakovsky joined Washington Journal on C-SPAN to discuss the threat HR 1 poses to the integrity of our elections.
Read more about this topic, here: https://www.heritage.org/testimony/how-states-can-improve-the-integrity-elections
Hans von Spakovsky is an authority on a wide range of issues – including civil rights, civil justice, the First Amendment, immigration, the rule of law and government reform — as a senior legal fellow in The Heritage Foundation’s Edwin Meese III Center for Legal and Judicial Studies. As manager of the think tank’s Election Law Reform Initiative, von Spakovsky also studies and writes about campaign finance restrictions, voter fraud and voter ID, enforcement of federal voting rights laws, administration of elections and voting equipment standards.
Check out his work here: https://www.heritage.org/staff/hans-von-spakovsky
Still haven’t subscribed to The Heritage Foundation on YouTube? Click here ► https://bit.ly/2otKliy
Follow The Heritage Foundation on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/heritagefoundation/
Follow The Heritage Foundation on Twitter: https://twitter.com/Heritage
Follow The Heritage Foundation on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/heritagefoundation/?hl=en
source
SPOLIATION – Election Fraud controversy is magnified by the refusal of state election officials to conduct credible audits of the original paper ballots or to credibly analyze flaws in the electronic voting apparatus and machines. Credible claims were made that mail in ballots were fake paper, printed in China, pre-marked by machines, not hand marked, not hand folded to fit in the envelope, and not mailed as purported. State election officials refused to allow forensic audits of paper ballots to confirm these allegations. State election officials instead destroyed large numbers of paper ballots immediately after demands to produce the paper ballots were made. State election officials claimed the ballots destroyed were not 2020 ballots, but there is no way to verify this. A credible concern rises that the fake paper, machine marked, unmailed ballots were substituted for legitimate paper, hand marked, and folded and manipulated to mimic postal mailing over the seven month period in which access to the ballots were denied. State election workers refused to allow monitoring of the election night count and the excessive adjudication process generated by manipulation of the voting machines notorious for facilitating election fraud across the globe. Credible evidence of interference with vote counting machines thru illegal wifi and internet modem connections were suppressed and not investigated. Instead of engaging in a credible forensic audit of the paper ballots and voter rolls for fraud, election officials engaged in endless election audit theater based upon little more than denial and propaganda politics.
.
Spoliation of evidence is the intentional, reckless, or negligent withholding, hiding, altering, fabricating, or destroying of evidence relevant to a legal proceeding. The spoliation inference is a negative evidentiary inference that a finder of fact can draw from a party's destruction of documents or things relevant to a proceeding: the finder of fact can review all evidence uncovered in as strong a light as possible against the spoliator and in favor of the opposing party. The theory of the spoliation inference is that when a party destroys evidence, it may be reasonable to infer that the party had "consciousness of guilt" or other motivation to avoid the evidence. Therefore, the factfinder may conclude that the evidence would have been unfavorable to the spoliator.
.
Under the spoliation inference, we may view the election fraud evidence uncovered in as strong a light as possible as proving state election officials deliberate engaged in, then concealed, a myriad of election fraud before, during and after the November 2020 presidential elections. Since State Officials refused to credibly investigate fraud allegations, withheld, destroyed and concealed evidence, it is reasonable to infer that state election officials had "consciousness of guilt" to avoid the evidence. Therefore, we may conclude that the evidence the state election officials destroyed or concealed would have proven that state election officials deliberately engaged in, and concealed, fraud in the 2020 election, and this resulted in blocking re-election of President Trump, and installing an illegitimate corrupt Marxist quisling traitor regime.
ELIMINATES STATE SOVEREIGNTY
This could very well spell the end of our country as we know it. Sad day, very sad day.
Interestingly, Afghanistan requires fingerprinting for voter identification and they also do biometric facial recognition for additional identification. All of these security precautions in a third world country. Meanwhile, Democrats want to pass out voter applications and ballots like candy at Halloween with NO identification required. I would say this is insane, but it is conscious malevolence to destroy the election process in their favor.
Duh. More FRAUD from the FRAUDS.
This law is total illegal. How can this possibly be brought to the Senate?
👍
AMERICA'S DEAD…..NOT COMING BACK. TEXAS MUST SECEDE NOW.
HR-1 = one Party State