The War on Work|5 Minute Video
The U.S. federal government has actually invested trillions of dollars in recent decades trying to combat hardship, yet the poverty rate has actually remained essentially unmoved. As social financial expert Michael Tanner explains, the “War on Poverty” has both dissuaded work and ensnared individuals in challenge. In 5 minutes, find out the truth about federal government’s counterproductive efforts to remove hardship.
PragerU is experiencing severe censorship on Big Tech platforms. Go to https://www.prageru.com/ to watch our videos devoid of censorship!
SUBSCRIBE https://www.prageru.com/join/
Take PragerU videos with you everywhere you go. Download our free mobile app!
Download for Apple iOS ➡ https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/prage …
Download for Android ➡ https://play.google.com/store/apps/de …
Join PragerU’s text list! https://optin.mobiniti.com/prageru
Love PragerU? Visit our shop today!
Script:
In 1965, President Lyndon Johnson notoriously stated a War on Poverty. Half a century later on, the hardship rate, the portion of individuals the federal government declares to be living in poverty, has actually barely changed.
The federal government funds 126 different anti-poverty programs. Seventy-two of these offer benefits either straight or indirectly to people. The cost? $680 billion in 2013. Include state and local government spending on hardship programs, another $280 billion, and the total pertains to nearly $1 trillion. That’s for one year.
Our poverty problem should be solved if just investing cash was the service. However plainly it’s not. We need a much better answer. And that answer, upon a couple of moments of reflection, need to be obvious. Work.
Only 2.5% of Americans working full time are, by federal government standards, thought about bad. Offered, then, that work is the road out of hardship, shouldn’t we be doing everything we can to encourage people to get on that road? Of course, we should.
However, we are doing simply the opposite. Our welfare benefits are regularly so generous that they discourage people from working. We have produced, possibly with the very best of intentions, what financial experts call a perverse reward – in this case, versus work. This is not to suggest that poor people are lazy. Many definitely aren’t. However they also aren’t stupid.
In a current research study for the Cato Institute, we took a look at what a common family on welfare might receive in benefits and compared that to what that recipient would require to earn in salaries to preserve the very same earnings. Our research study looked at a normal welfare family with two kids under the age of five. We assumed that this household gets gain from the 7 most common well-being programs: Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) – a straight cash program, Medicaid, Food Stamps, Women Infants and Children nutrition program or WIC, public real estate coupons, energies help, and the Commodity Supplemental Food Program or CSFP which offers staples such as cheese, milk, canned vegetables and other fundamental dietary items.
Naturally, not every well-being recipient gets all these advantages, but some get take advantage of much more programs. With 72 programs involved, there is a buffet of options. If our hypothetical household had children older than 5, they would not receive benefits from the Women Infants and Children program, WIC. Rather, they would secure free school breakfasts and lunches. Our study discovered that the value of these benefits vary from a low of $16,984 in Mississippi to an astonishing high of $49,175 in Hawaii.
And keep this in mind: welfare benefits are not taxed, while earnings are. That means that in numerous states well-being recipients would have to make even more by working than they receive in benefits for not working in order to come out even.
For the complete script, see https://www.prageru.com/videos/war-work
source
The U.S. government has actually spent trillions of dollars in current decades attempting to fight hardship, yet the hardship rate has remained essentially unmoved. As social economic expert Michael Tanner discusses, the “War on Poverty” has both prevented work and ensnared individuals in difficulty. Half a century later on, the hardship rate, the percentage of people the government declares to be living in hardship, has hardly altered. Provided, then, that work is the roadway out of hardship, shouldn’t we be doing whatever we can to motivate individuals to get on that roadway? Our well-being advantages are frequently so generous that they dissuade individuals from working.
