What’s Wrong with Atheism?– Science and God
Is there any implying to life? Or is life absolutely nothing more than a cosmic accident? Scientific atheists claim the latter, however ironically, it’s science itself that suggests the former.
PragerU is experiencing severe censorship on Big Tech platforms. Go to https://www.prageru.com/ to see our videos free from censorship!
SUBSCRIBE https://www.prageru.com/join/
Take PragerU videos with you all over you go. Download our totally free mobile app!
Download for Apple iOS ➡ https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/prageru/id1115115779
Download for Android ➡ https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.cappital.prageru
To view the FACTS & SOURCES and Transcript, check out: https://www.prageru.com/video/whats-wrong-with-atheism-science-and-god
Join PragerU’s text list! https://optin.mobiniti.com/prageru
Love PragerU? Visit our shop today!
Script:
In a current interview, while I existed some clinical discoveries that may indicate the existence of God, a camera operator, a young woman whom I’ll call Maria, started to weep noticeably. Later on she told me the factor for her tears.
Like lots of young people, Maria believed in God when she got here in college. However while there, she repeatedly experienced teachers who firmly insisted that based on “the science” God was a misconception..
No more real than Santa Claus.
Maria didn’t feel geared up to challenge her teachers. She ultimately left college with irritating doubts about her faith and questioning whether life, including her own life, may be nothing more than a cosmic accident.
Lots of youths share Maria’s doubts.
Powerful voices in the academy tell us that science makes belief in God– and human significance– illogical. For instance, as Richard Dawkins, the well known atheist from Oxford, has actually asserted” [ t] he universe we observe has precisely the properties we need to anticipate if there is, at bottom, no style, no purpose … absolutely nothing but blind, merciless indifference.”.
Are we the item of such indifference– that is, purely materialistic procedures that “did not have us in mind” as another scientific atheist has put it? Does the universe have the properties we should expect if this “all there is matter” vision of reality is proper?.
Perhaps not. 3 major scientific discoveries contradict the expectations of clinical atheists and point rather in a noticeably God-friendly instructions..
The Big Bang. Discoveries in observational astronomy and developments in theoretical physics have exposed that the universe had a start. This contrasts the expectations of scientific materialists, who long portrayed deep space as self-existent and everlasting and, for that reason, in no need of an external developer..
This proof for a start has rather validated the expectations of theists. Nobel laureate Arno Penzias assisted make a crucial discovery developing a cosmic beginning. He later observed, “The best data we have are precisely what I would have forecasted, had I absolutely nothing to go on however the very first five books of Moses … and the Bible as a whole.”.
And he’s not alone. Cosmological evidence has led other popular researchers– consisting of previous MIT physicist Gerald Schroeder and the excellent Caltech astronomer Allan Sandage– to verify a transcendent developer beyond area and time as the best description for the origin of our finite universe..
Second, fine-tuning. We live in what Australian physicist Luke Barnes calls an incredibly “Fortunate Universe,” where fundamental laws and physical criteria have in some way been “fine-tuned” with simply the best strengths and values to make life possible. The unbelievable odds versus this taking place by chance has actually led atheistic and even agnostic physicists to marvel. As British physicist Paul Davies has actually exclaimed, “the impression of style is overwhelming.” Atheist physicist George Greenstein reveals similar cognitive harshness: “The idea insistently develops that some supernatural … Agency, need to be included …”.
Third, the intricacy of life. Molecular biology has actually exposed the presence in living cells of a beautiful world of informative nano-technology– digital code in DNA and RNA; small, intricately-constructed molecular machines, a complex, information storage, processing and transmission system that resembles, however vastly exceeds, our most sophisticated digital high-technology.
Not what anyone would expect to view as the result of blind materialistic procedures..
Dawkins himself might have yielded as much when he just recently admitted to being knocked “sideways with wonder at the miniaturized complexity of the data-processing machinery in the living cell.”.
So what should we make of all this?
For the total script in addition to FACTS & SOURCES, go to https://www.prageru.com/video/whats-wrong-with-atheism-science-and-god.
source
Is there any meaning to life? Scientific atheists claim the latter, however ironically, it’s science itself that recommends the previous.
Effective voices in the academy inform us that science makes belief in God– and human significance– untenable. Discoveries in observational astronomy and advancements in theoretical physics have actually revealed that the universe had a beginning. We live in what Australian physicist Luke Barnes calls an incredibly “Fortunate Universe,” where fundamental laws and physical specifications have actually in some way been “fine-tuned” with just the right strengths and values to make life possible.
